QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P
Right arrow Articles by Hardman, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P
Right arrow Articles by Hardman, G
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Research
Right arrow Information in Practice (journal section)
Quality in Health Care 2001;10: 83-89
© 2001 Quality in Health Care


Paper

Access to the evidence base from general practice: a survey of general practice staff in Northern and Yorkshire Region

P Wilson1, J Droogan1, J Glanville1, I Watt2, G Hardman3

1 NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO1 5DD, UK
2 Department of Health Studies, University of York
3 Centre for Health Economics, University of York

Dr P Wilson pmw7{at}york.ac.uk Aim—To identify and describe current methods of making health related research evidence accessible to general practice staff in the Northern and Yorkshire Region.

Method—A postal survey questionnaire of general practice staff in the Northern and Yorkshire Region.

Results—At least one completed questionnaire was obtained from 70% of the general practices surveyed, and the individual response rate to the survey was 45%. Just under 60% of all respondents reported having no access to the NHS internet and just under 50% also reported having no access to the internet. All respondents in this survey reported greater access to paper based information than to electronic databases. However, this research provides evidence of differential access to information resources between different professions in general practice with GPs clearly having easier access than other professions to both paper based resources and electronic databases. 70% of all respondents said that they would need to be trained to use either a computer, the internet, or to search databases if the opportunity for easy access to any of these information services was available.

Conclusions—At the time of this survey, general practices seemed to be struggling to set up the infrastructure and develop the skills that are necessary to make best use of available research evidence. In addition, there is a need for further investigation into the reasons why different professions working in the same practice setting have differential access to information resources available in primary care.

Key Words: general practice; effectiveness; access to information; internet; databases




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. B. Haynes, C. Cotoi, J. Holland, L. Walters, N. Wilczynski, D. Jedraszewski, J. McKinlay, R. Parrish, K. A. McKibbon, and for the McMaster Premium Literature Service (PLUS)
Second-order peer review of the medical literature for clinical practitioners.
JAMA, April 19, 2006; 295(15): 1801 - 1808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
S. de Lusignan
The National Health Service and the internet
J R Soc Med, October 1, 2003; 96(10): 490 - 493.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.