| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Paper |
1 Department of Medicine, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
2 National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 PL, UK
Dr M N Marshall martin.marshall{at}man.ac.uk Objectives—Little is known about the quality of clinical care provided outside the hospital sector, despite the increasingly important role of clinical generalists working in primary care. In this study we aimed to summarise published evaluations of the quality of clinical care provided in general practice in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand.
Design—A systematic review of published studies assessing the quality of clinical care in general practice for the period 1995–9.
Setting—General practice based care in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand.
Main outcome measures—Study design, sampling strategy and size, clinical conditions studied, quality of care attained for each condition (compared with explicit or implicit standards for the process of care), and country of origin for each study.
Results—Ninety papers fulfilled the entry criteria for the review, 80 from the UK, six from Australia, and four from New Zealand. Two thirds of the studies assessed care in self-selected practices and 20% of the studies were based in single practices. The majority (85.5%) examined the quality of care provided for chronic conditions including cardiovascular disease (22%), hypertension (14%), diabetes (14%), and asthma (13%). A further 12% and 2% examined preventive care and acute conditions, respectively. In almost all studies the processes of care did not attain the standards set out in national guidelines or those set by the researchers themselves. For example, in the highest achieving practices 49% of diabetic patients had had their fundii examined in the previous year and 47% of eligible patients had been prescribed beta blockers after an acute myocardial infarction.
Conclusions—This study adopts an overview of the magnitude and the nature of clinical quality problems in general practice in three countries. Most of the studies in the systematic review come from the UK and the small number of papers from Australia and New Zealand make it more difficult to draw conclusions about the quality of care in these two countries. The review helps to identify deficiencies in the research, clinical and policy agendas in a part of the health care system where quality of care has been largely ignored to date. Further work is required to evaluate the quality of clinical care in a representative sample of the population, to identify the reasons for substandard care, and to test strategies to improve the clinical care provided in general practice.
Key Words: quality of care; clinical effectiveness; technical effectiveness; general practice; systematic review
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Foy and M. Eccles Structured career pathways in academic primary care Fam. Pract., February 16, 2008; (2008) cmn004v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Coenen, M. Ferech, F. M Haaijer-Ruskamp, C. C Butler, R. H Vander Stichele, T. J M Verheij, D. L Monnet, P. Little, H. Goossens, and the ESAC Project Group European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): quality indicators for outpatient antibiotic use in Europe Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 440 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Millett, S. Saxena, A. Ng, A. Mainous III, and A. Majeed Socio-economic status, ethnicity and diabetes management: an analysis of time trends using the health survey for England J. Public Health Med., December 1, 2007; 29(4): 413 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Marshall, N. Klazinga, S. Leatherman, C. Hardy, E. Bergmann, L. Pisco, S. Mattke, and J. Mainz OECD Health Care Quality Indicator Project. The expert panel on primary care prevention and health promotion Int. J. Qual. Health Care, September 1, 2006; 18(suppl_1): 21 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Doran, C. Fullwood, H. Gravelle, D. Reeves, E. Kontopantelis, U. Hiroeh, and M. Roland Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. N. Engl. J. Med., July 27, 2006; 355(4): 375 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Gregory, Y. Bostock, and K. Backett-Milburn Recovering from a heart attack: a qualitative study into lay experiences and the struggle to make lifestyle changes Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 220 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Wilson, M. Roland, and C. Ham The contribution of general practice and the general practitioner to NHS patients J R Soc Med, January 1, 2006; 99(1): 24 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Marshall and T. Wilson Competition in general practice BMJ, November 19, 2005; 331(7526): 1196 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M Campbell, M. O Roland, E. Middleton, and D. Reeves Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study BMJ, November 12, 2005; 331(7525): 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. AL-Ahmadi and M. Roland Quality of primary health care in Saudi Arabia: a comprehensive review Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2005; 17(4): 331 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Wilson, D. Buck, and C. Ham Rising to the challenge: will the NHS support people with long term conditions? BMJ, March 19, 2005; 330(7492): 657 - 661. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S M Campbell, T Shield, A Rogers, and L Gask How do stakeholder groups vary in a Delphi technique about primary mental health care and what factors influence their ratings? Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2004; 13(6): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Roland Linking Physicians' Pay to the Quality of Care -- A Major Experiment in the United Kingdom N. Engl. J. Med., September 30, 2004; 351(14): 1448 - 1454. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N Steel, D Melzer, P G Shekelle, N S Wenger, D Forsyth, and B C McWilliams Developing quality indicators for older adults: transfer from the USA to the UK is feasible Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2004; 13(4): 260 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P McElduff, G Lyratzopoulos, R Edwards, R F Heller, P Shekelle, and M Roland Will changes in primary care improve health outcomes? Modelling the impact of financial incentives introduced to improve quality of care in the UK Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2004; 13(3): 191 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S A Kirk, S M Campbell, S Kennell-Webb, D Reeves, M O Roland, and M N Marshall Assessing the quality of care of multiple conditions in general practice: practical and methodological problems Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2003; 12(6): 421 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S M Campbell, J Braspenning, A Hutchinson, and M N Marshall Improving the quality of health care: Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care BMJ, April 12, 2003; 326(7393): 816 - 819. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Shield, S Campbell, A Rogers, A Worrall, C Chew-Graham, and L Gask Quality indicators for primary care mental health services Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2003; 12(2): 100 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Shekelle New contract for general practitioners BMJ, March 1, 2003; 326(7387): 457 - 458. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S M Campbell, M Hann, J Hacker, A Durie, A Thapar, and M O Roland Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2002; 11(2): 125 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S M Campbell, R Sheaff, B Sibbald, M N Marshall, S Pickard, L Gask, S Halliwell, A Rogers, and M O Roland Implementing clinical governance in English primary care groups/trusts: reconciling quality improvement and quality assurance Qual. Saf. Health Care, March 1, 2002; 11(1): 9 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S M Campbell, J Braspenning, A Hutchinson, and M Marshall Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care Qual. Saf. Health Care, January 12, 2002; 11(4): 358 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S M Campbell, M Hann, J Hacker, C Burns, D Oliver, A Thapar, N Mead, D G. Safran, and M O Roland Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study BMJ, October 6, 2001; 323(7316): 784 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Khunti Quality of clinical care in general practice Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(3): 132 - 133. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
