HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wagner, C Articles by de Bakker, D H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wagner, C Articles by de Bakker, D H Related Collections Indicators and performance management Quality improvement Long term care

The effectiveness of quality systems in nursing homes: a review

¹ NIVEL, Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research, P O Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
² EMGO, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, and Department of Social Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Dr C Wagner c.wagner{at}nivel.nl Background—The need for quality improvement and increasing concern about the costs and appropriateness of health care has led to the implementation of quality systems in healthcare organisations. In addition, nursing homes have made significant investments in their development. The effects of the implementation of quality systems on health related outcomes are not yet clear.

Objective—To examine evidence in the literature on whether quality systems have an impact on the care process and the satisfaction and health outcomes of long term care residents.

Methods—Review of the literature.

Results—The 21 empirical studies identified concerned quality system activities such as the implementation of guidelines; providing feedback on outcomes; assessment of the needs of residents by means of care planning, internal audits and tuition; and an ombudsman for residents. Only four articles described controlled studies. The selected articles were grouped according to five focal areas of quality. The opinion of residents was seldom used to evaluate the effectiveness of quality systems. The effects on care processes and the health outcomes of long term care residents were inconsistent, but there was some evidence from the controlled studies that specific training and guidelines can influence the outcomes at the patient level.

Conclusions—The design of most of the studies meant that it was not possible to attribute the results entirely to the newly implemented quality system. As it is difficult in practice to design a randomised controlled study, future research into the effectiveness of quality systems should not only focus on selected correlates of quality, but should also include a qualitative and quantitative (multivariate and multilevel) approach. The methods used to measure quality need to be improved.

Key Words: quality measurement; long term care; nursing homes; effectiveness

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Fahey, A. A Montgomery, J. Barnes, and J. Protheroe Quality of care for elderly residents in nursing homes and elderly people living at home: controlled observational study BMJ, March 15, 2003; 326(7389): 580 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B McCormack and H McKenna Challenges to quality monitoring systems in care homes Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2001; 10(4): 200 - 201. [Full Text]