HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Swinglehurst, D A Articles by Fuller, J C A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Swinglehurst, D A Articles by Fuller, J C A Related Collections Other Medical Informatics Changing physician behavior

A clinical informaticist to support primary care decision making

D A Swinglehurst, general practitioner and clinical informaticist, M Pierce, senior lecturer, J C A Fuller, research assistant

Imperial College, London, UK

Dr D A Swinglehurst, 199 Norwich Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP1 4BX, UK deborah{at} swinglehurst.fsbusiness.co.uk Objectives—To develop and evaluate an information service in which a "clinical informaticist" (a GP with training in evidence-based medicine) provided evidence-based answers to questions posed by GPs and nurse practitioners.

Design—Descriptive pilot study with systematic recording of the process involved in searching for and critically appraising literature. Evaluation by questionnaire and semi-structured interview.

Setting—General practice.

Participants—34 clinicians from two London primary care groups (Fulham and Hammersmith).

Main outcome measures—Number and origin of questions; process and time involved in producing summaries; satisfaction with the service.

Results—All 100 clinicians in two primary care groups were approached. Thirty four agreed to participate, of whom 22 asked 60 questions over 10 months. Participants were highly satisfied with the summaries they received. For one third of questions the clinicians stated they would change practice in the index patient, and for 55% the participants stated they would change practice in other patients. Answering questions thoroughly was time consuming (median 130 minutes). The median turnaround time was 9 days; 82% of questions were answered within the timeframe specified by the questioner. Without the informaticist, one third of questions would not have been pursued.

Conclusion—The clinical informaticist service increased access to evidence for busy clinicians. Satisfaction was high among users and clinicians stated that changes in practice would occur. However, uptake of the service was lower than expected (22% of those offered the service). Further research is needed into how this method of increasing access to evidence compares with other strategies, and whether it results in improved health outcomes for patients.

Key Words: clinical informaticist; evidence-based medicine; information services

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Ely, J. A. Osheroff, S. M. Maviglia, and M. E. Rosenbaum Patient-Care Questions that Physicians Are Unable to Answer J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2007; 14(4): 407 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Forsetlund, K. O. Talseth, P. Bradley, L. Nordheim, and A. Bjorndal Many A Slip Between Cup And Lip: Process Evaluation of a Program to Promote and Support Evidence-Based Public Health Practice Eval Rev, April 1, 2003; 27(2): 179 - 209. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A Juche, U Euler, B Bruggenjurgen, S N Willich, and R Kunz External research service with critical appraisal of the medical literature at a university medical centre Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2002; 11(3): 297 - 297. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Greenhalgh, J. Hughes, C. Humphrey, S. Rogers, D. Swinglehurst, and P. Martin A comparative case study of two models of a clinical informaticist service BMJ, March 2, 2002; 324(7336): 524 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]