QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Web-only Glossary
Right arrow Web-only Questionnaire
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shield, T
Right arrow Articles by Gask, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shield, T
Right arrow Articles by Gask, L
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Articles
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:100-106
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute for Healthcare Improvement

Quality indicators for primary care mental health services

T Shield1, S Campbell1, A Rogers1, A Worrall2, C Chew-Graham3, L Gask1

1 National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
2 College Research Unit, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London SW1H 0HW, UK
3 Department of General Practice, University of Manchester, Manchester M14 5NP, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr S Campbell, National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK;
stephen.campbell{at}man.ac.uk

Objectives: To identify a generic set of face valid quality indicators for primary care mental health services which reflect a multi-stakeholder perspective and can be used for facilitating quality improvement.

Design: Modified two-round postal Delphi questionnaire.

Setting: Geographical spread across Great Britain.

Participants: One hundred and fifteen panellists representing 11 different stakeholder groups within primary care mental health services (clinical psychologist, health and social care commissioner, community psychiatric nurse, counsellor, general practitioner, practice nurse/district nurse/health visitor, psychiatrist, social worker, carer, patient and voluntary organisations).

Main outcome measures: Face validity (median rating of 8 or 9 on a nine point scale with agreement by all panels) for assessing quality of care.

Results: A maximum of 334 indicators were rated by panels in the second round; 26% were rated valid by all panels. These indicators were categorised into 21 aspects of care, 11 relating to general practices and 10 relating to health authorities or primary care groups/trusts. There was variation in the total number of indicators rated valid across the different panels. Overall, GPs rated the lowest number of indicators as valid (41%, n=138) and carers rated the highest number valid (91%, n=304).

Conclusions: The quality indicators represent consensus among key stakeholder groups in defining quality of care within primary care mental health services. These indicators could provide a guide for primary care organisations embarking on quality improvement initiatives in mental health care when addressing national targets and standards relating to primary care set out in the National Service Framework for Mental Health for England. Although many of the indicators relate to parochial issues in UK service delivery, the methodology used in the development of the indicators could be applied in other settings to produce locally relevant indicators.


Keywords: quality indicators; mental health; Delphi; primary care


Relevant Articles

Action points
Tim Albert
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003 12: 160. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Quality indicators for mental health in primary care: how far have we got?
D J Sharp
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003 12: 85-86. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cfpHome page
I. Payot, J. Latour, F. Massoud, and M.-J. Kergoat
Validation d'indicateurs de la prise en charge des atteintes des fonctions cognitives dans les unites d'evaluation geriatrique
Can Fam Physician, November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1944 - 1952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic IllnessHome page
S. M. Campbell, C. Gately, and L. Gask
Identifying the patient perspective of the quality of mental healthcare for common chronic problems: a qualitative study
Chronic Illness, March 1, 2007; 3(1): 46 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
R. C. Hermann, S. Mattke, D. Somekh, H. Silfverhielm, E. Goldner, G. Glover, J. Pirkis, J. Mainz, and J. A. Chan
Quality indicators for international benchmarking of mental health care
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, September 1, 2006; 18(suppl_1): 31 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
S M Campbell, T Shield, A Rogers, and L Gask
How do stakeholder groups vary in a Delphi technique about primary mental health care and what factors influence their ratings?
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2004; 13(6): 428 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Roland
Linking Physicians' Pay to the Quality of Care -- A Major Experiment in the United Kingdom
N. Engl. J. Med., September 30, 2004; 351(14): 1448 - 1454.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
S M Campbell, J Robison, A Steiner, D Webb, and M O Roland
Improving the quality of mental health services in Personal Medical Services pilots: a longitudinal qualitative study
Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2004; 13(2): 115 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
D J Sharp
Quality indicators for mental health in primary care: how far have we got?
Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2003; 12(2): 85 - 86.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.