HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Buetow, S A Articles by Wellingham, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Buetow, S A Articles by Wellingham, J

Accreditation of general practices: challenges and lessons

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Dr S A Buetow, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand;
s.buetow{at}auckland.ac.nz
ABSTRACT
To flourish, practice accreditation must meet challenges. It needs to manage uncertainty over its effectiveness and cost effectiveness, to address concerns that it erodes professional autonomy, and to promote and elucidate the conditions under which it is appropriate. Lessons from Australia and New Zealand help to focus these challenges. The lessons include the need to reward quality practices, loosen professional control over accreditation, trade some consistency of standards for validity, develop standards that acknowledge cultural diversity, and be transparent. Another lesson is to separate quality control from quality improvement within a coordinated systems based framework, with practices being helped to pay for accreditation and quality improvement. Such assistance is important because, in the presence of unintended variations in practice service delivery, all practices should have to show that they meet or exceed minimum standards while aiming for excellence.

Keywords: accreditation; general practice

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. El-Jardali, D. Jamal, H. Dimassi, W. Ammar, and V. Tchaghchaghian The impact of hospital accreditation on quality of care: perception of Lebanese nurses Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 20(5): 363 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Engels, M. Dautzenberg, S. Campbell, B. Broge, N. Boffin, M. Marshall, G. Elwyn, V. Vodopivec-Jamsek, F. M Gerlach, M. Samuelson, et al. Testing a European set of indicators for the evaluation of the management of primary care practices Fam. Pract., February 1, 2006; 23(1): 137 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G Elwyn, M Rhydderch, A Edwards, H Hutchings, M Marshall, P Myres, and R Grol Assessing organisational development in primary medical care using a group based assessment: the Maturity MatrixTM Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2004; 13(4): 287 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Rhydderch, G Elwyn, M Marshall, and R Grol Organisational change theory and the use of indicators in general practice Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2004; 13(3): 213 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: