HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bessell, T L Articles by Hiller, J E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bessell, T L Articles by Hiller, J E Topic Collections Related Articles

Surfing, self-medicating and safety: buying non-prescription and complementary medicines via the internet

¹ Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
² School of Pharmaceutical, Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, University of South Australia, SA, Australia
³ Department of Public Health, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia

Correspondence to:
Ms T Bessell, Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia 3168;
tracey.bessell{at}med.monash.edu.au Objective: To examine whether the sale of medicines via the internet supports their safe and appropriate use.

Design: e-Pharmacy websites were identified using key words and a metasearch engine and the quality of information published on these websites was surveyed using the DISCERN tool. A case scenario and internet pharmacy practice standards were also used to evaluate the quality of care delivered.

Setting and participants: Between July and September 2001 104 websites were surveyed and 27 sent either Sudafed (pseudoephedrine HCl), St John’s wort products, or both to a residential address in Melbourne, Australia.

Main outcome measures: Quality of health information (DISCERN ratings), information exchanged between e-pharmacy staff and consumers, and product and delivery costs.

Results: Of 104 e-pharmacies from at least 13 different countries, 63 websites provided some health information but overall the quality of the information was poor. Only three website operators provided adequate advice to consumers to avoid a potential drug interaction. The costs for a daily dose of pseudoephedrine HCl (240 mg) ranged from A$0.81 to A$3.04, and delivery costs from A$3.28 to A$62.70.

Conclusion: Consumers who self-select medicines from websites have insufficient access to information and advice at the point of ordering and on delivery to make informed decisions about their safe and appropriate use.

Keywords: internet; non-prescription medicines; complementary medicines; online drug information

Related Articles

Action points

Tim Albert
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003 12: 160. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A Veronin, E. Lee, and E N. Lewis "Insight" into Drug Quality: Comparison of Simvastatin Tablets from the US and Canada Obtained via the Internet Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2007; 41(7): 1111 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Bhatt-Mehta Over-the-Counter Cough and Cold Medicines: Should Parents Be Using Them for Their Children? Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2004; 38(11): 1964 - 1966. [Full Text] [PDF]