QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elwyn, G
Right arrow Articles by Britten, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elwyn, G
Right arrow Articles by Britten, N
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:i33
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement

"Doing prescribing": how might clinicians work differently for better, safer care

G Elwyn1, A Edwards1, N Britten2

1 Primary Care Group, Swansea Clinical School, University of Wales Swansea, Grove Building, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
2 Institute of Clinical Education, The Peninsula Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK

Correspondence to:
Professor G Elwyn
Primary Care Group, Swansea Clinical School, University of Wales Swansea, Grove Building, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK; g.elwyn{at}swansea.ac.uk Prescribing medicines is a cornerstone of medical practice. There is, however, ample evidence that the prescribing process is far from ideal when viewed from the perspective of patients who wish to understand why they should take medicine, what potential harm they might face, and how they might integrate medicine taking into the pattern of their life, beliefs, and attitudes. Misalignment between clinicians and patients about medicine taking leads to a multitude of problems. Recently, a concept known as concordance has been suggested, where the prescribing interaction is seen as a process where both the patient and professional views and beliefs about medication, and the associated harms and benefits, are shared and negotiated. This interaction depends on a communication process that is becoming known as shared decision making between clinicians and patients. Although there is as yet little evidence that this approach leads to improved clinical outcomes, ethical principles and the core values of medical practice suggest that involving patients in the prescribing process will lead to better, safer care.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.