HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Web-only Appendix Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Calnan, M W Articles by Sanford, E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Calnan, M W Articles by Sanford, E Topic Collections Related Articles

Public trust in health care: the system or the doctor?

Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK

Correspondence to:
Professor M W Calnan
Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK; m.w.calnan{at}bristol.ac.uk Objectives: To examine how the public assess trust in health care in England and Wales.

Design: Postal structured questionnaire in cross sectional survey.

Setting: Random sample of people on the electoral register in England and Wales.

Subjects: People aged 18 and over.

Main outcome measures: General levels of trust and confidence in health care.

Results: The response rate was 48% (n = 1187). The mean level of confidence (trust) in the healthcare system was 6.0 out of a score of 10. Levels of distrust appeared relatively high with at least 356 (30%) respondents reporting little or very little trust for 28 of 32 specific aspects of health care. The highest levels of distrust were found in relation to how the health service was run and financed, particularly waiting times and the implication of cost cutting for patients. Statistical analysis by univariable linear regression of the specific determinants of generic assessments of public trust (confidence) suggested that the key aspects were patient centred care and levels of professional expertise. Being covered by private health insurance was also a key determinant of levels of public trust.

Conclusion: Public assessment of trust tends to address the views of care at the micro level. Policy makers concerned with the erosion of public trust need to target aspects associated with patient centred care and professional expertise.

Keywords: public trust; quality of care; doctor-patient relationship

Related Articles

Quality Lines
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 85. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Kuhlmann Traces of Doubt and Sources of Trust: Health Professions in an Uncertain Society Current Sociology, July 1, 2006; 54(4): 607 - 620. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Allsop Regaining Trust in Medicine: Professional and State Strategies Current Sociology, July 1, 2006; 54(4): 621 - 636. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Rowe and M. Calnan Trust relations in health care--the new agenda Eur J Public Health, February 1, 2006; 16(1): 4 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Mensah Eliminating Disparities in Cardiovascular Health: Six Strategic Imperatives and a Framework for Action Circulation, March 15, 2005; 111(10): 1332 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M R Dibben and H T O Davies Trustworthy doctors in confidence building systems Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2004; 13(2): 88 - 89. [Full Text]