HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Anton, C Articles by Ferner, R E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Anton, C Articles by Ferner, R E

Improving prescribing using a rule based prescribing system

¹ West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
² Wolfson Computer Laboratory, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
³ Renal Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK

Correspondence to:
Mr C Anton
West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK; christopher.anton{at}swbh.nhs.uk Objective: To test the hypothesis that the prescribing behaviour of doctors would improve after having experience with a computerised rule based prescribing system.

Design: A prospective observational study of changes in prescribing habits resulting from the use of a computerised prescribing system in (1) a cohort of experienced users compared with a new cohort, and (2) a single cohort at the beginning and after 3 weeks of computer aided prescribing.

Setting: 64 bed renal unit in a teaching hospital.

Intervention: Routine use of a computerised prescribing system by doctors and nurses on a renal unit from 1 July to 31 August 2001.

Main outcome measures: Number of warning messages generated by the system; proportion of warning messages overridden; comparison between doctors of different grades; comparison by doctors’ familiarity with the system.

Results: A total of 51 612 records relating to 5995 prescriptions made by 103 users, of whom 42 were doctors, were analysed. The prescriptions generated 15 853 messages, of which 6592 were warning messages indicating prescribing errors or problems. Doctors new to the system generated fewer warning messages after using the system for 3 weeks (0.81 warning messages per prescription v 0.42 after 3 weeks, p = 0.03). Doctors with more experience of the system were less likely to generate a warning message (Spearman’s = –0.90, p = 0.04) but were more likely to disregard one (Spearman’s = –1, p<0.01). Senior doctors were more likely than junior doctors to ignore a warning message.

Conclusions: Doctors are influenced by the experience of using a computerised prescribing system. When judged by the number of warning messages generated per prescription, their prescribing improves with time and number of prescriptions written. Consultants and registrars are more likely to use their clinical judgement to override warning messages regarding prescribed drugs.

Keywords: prescribing; computerised system; medication errors

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. D. Franklin, K. O'Grady, P. Donyai, A. Jacklin, and N. Barber The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]