HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Urbach, D R Articles by Baxter, N N Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Urbach, D R Articles by Baxter, N N

Does it matter what a hospital is "high volume" for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data^*

¹ Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, 9EN-236A, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
² Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Cancer Center, MMC 806, 420, Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Correspondence to:
D R Urbach
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, 9EN-236A, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada; david.urbach{at}uhn.on.ca Objective: To determine whether the improved outcome of a surgical procedure in high volume hospitals is specific to the volume of the same procedure.

Design and setting: Analysis of secondary data in Ontario, Canada.

Participants: Patients having an oesophagectomy, colorectal resection for cancer, pancreaticoduodenectomy, major lung resection for cancer, or repair of an unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm between 1994 and 1999.

Main outcome measures: Odds ratio for death within 30 days of surgery in relation to the hospital volume of the same surgical procedure and the hospital volume of the other four procedures. Estimates were adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidity and accounted for hospital level clustering.

Results: With the exception of colorectal resection, 30 day mortality seemed to be inversely related not only to the hospital volume of the same procedure but also to the hospital volume of most of the other procedures. In some cases the effect of the volume of a different procedure was stronger than the effect of the volume of the same procedure. For example, the association of mortality from pancreaticoduodenectomy with hospital volume of lung resection (odds ratio for death in hospitals with a high volume of lung resection compared with low volume 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.57) was much stronger than the association of mortality from pancreaticoduodenectomy with hospital volume of pancreaticoduodenectomy (0.76, 0.44 to 1.32).

Conclusion: The inverse association between high volume of procedure and risk of operative death is not specific to the volume of the procedure being studied.

Keywords: hospital volume outcome; high volume; surgical procedures

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. Meguid, B. S. Brooke, D. C. Chang, J. T. Sherwood, M. V. Brock, and S. C. Yang Are Surgical Outcomes for Lung Cancer Resections Improved at Teaching Hospitals? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 1015 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Boutron, D. Moher, D. G. Altman, K. F. Schulz, P. Ravaud, and for the CONSORT Group Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration Ann Intern Med, February 19, 2008; 148(4): 295 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Filipovic, M. J Goldacre, and L. Gill Elective surgery for aortic abdominal aneurysm: comparison of English outcomes with those elsewhere J. Epidemiol. Community Health, March 1, 2007; 61(3): 226 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]