QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, S
Right arrow Articles by Black, P N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, S
Right arrow Articles by Black, P N
Related Collections
Right arrow Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery
Right arrow Drugs: infections
Right arrow Quality improvement
Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:384-387
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


QUALITY IMPROVEMENT REPORT

Use of a preprinted sticker to improve the prescribing of prophylactic antibiotics for hip fracture surgery

S Ritchie1, N Scanlon2, M Lewis3, P N Black1

1 Department of Medicine, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
2 Department of Pharmacy, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
3 Department of Pharmacy, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Dr S Ritchie
Medical Registrar, Auckland Hospital, Private Bag 92014, Auckland; sritch{at}adhb.govt.nz
ABSTRACT
Problem: Antibiotic prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the number of postoperative infections following surgery for hip fracture. At Auckland Hospital the policy for antibiotic prophylaxis for hip fracture surgery is for the patient to receive the first dose of antibiotic at the induction of anaesthesia followed by two more doses at 8 hour intervals. A previous audit found that patients often received too many doses of antibiotic. A retrospective audit was performed of 100 patients undergoing surgery for a hip fracture. The primary problem was over-prescribing; 68 patients (68%) received more than three doses. The number of patients who received three doses according to the guidelines was 29 (29%, 95% CI 21 to 40).

Setting: Auckland Hospital which provides acute orthopaedic services for a population of 500 000.

Strategy for change: A sticker was introduced with the prescription printed on it. The sticker was applied to the medication chart by the anaesthetist when the initial dose of antibiotic was given. Charts of a further 100 patients were reviewed after the introduction of the sticker and compared with those from another hospital in Auckland where the sticker was not used.

Effects of change: The number of patients who received three doses, in accordance with the guidelines, improved to 74 (74%, 95% CI 64 to 82, p<0.001). These changes were observed even though the sticker was only used in 44 patients (44%, 95% CI 34 to 54). At the other hospital the number of patients who received three doses was 10 (20%, 95% CI 10 to 42) and 13 (26%, 95% CI 15 to 40, p = 0.37) for the same two periods.

Lessons learnt: The use of a preprinted sticker is a simple intervention which improves the use of antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of surgery. This improvement occurred even though the sticker was used in slightly fewer than half the cases.


Keywords: antibiotic prophylaxis; hip fracture; preprinted sticker




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
R K Crowley, F Fitzpatrick, D Solanki, S FitzGerald, H Humphreys, and E G Smyth
Vancomycin administration: the impact of multidisciplinary interventions
J. Clin. Pathol., October 1, 2007; 60(10): 1155 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.