QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abrahamson, S
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, R M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abrahamson, S
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, R M
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:395-397
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


CLASSIC PAPER

Effectiveness of a simulator in training anesthesiology residents*

S Abrahamson1, J S Denson2, R M Wolf3

1 Director, Division of Research in Medical Education, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA
2 Professor of Surgery (Anesthesiology Chairman), University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA
3 Department of Psychology, Teachers College-Columbia University, New York City, USA


ABSTRACT
The educational potential of a computer-controlled patient simulator was tested by the University of Southern California School of Medicine. The results of the experiment suggest unequivocally that there is a twofold advantage to the use of such a simulator in training anesthesiology residents in the skill of endotracheal intubation: (a) residents achieve proficiency levels in a smaller number of elapsed days of training, thus effecting a saving of time in the training of personnel, and (b) residents achieve a proficiency level in a smaller number of trials in the operating room, thus posing significantly less threat to patient safety. The small number of subjects in the study and the large within-group variability were responsible for a lack of statistical significance in 4 of 6 of the analyses performed; however, all differences were substantial and in the hypothesized direction. Thus, despite the narrowly circumscribed tasks to be learned by the experimental subjects, the findings suggest that the use of simulation devices should be considered in planning for future education and training not only in medicine but in other health care professions as well.


Keywords: simulation; training


Relevant Article

Quality Lines
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 321. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
P. D. Kory, L. A. Eisen, M. Adachi, V. A. Ribaudo, M. E. Rosenthal, and P. H. Mayo
Initial Airway Management Skills of Senior Residents: Simulation Training Compared With Traditional Training
Chest, December 1, 2007; 132(6): 1927 - 1931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
G. K. Lighthall and J. Barr
The Use of Clinical Simulation Systems to Train Critical Care Physicians
J Intensive Care Med, September 1, 2007; 22(5): 257 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.