|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
DEVELOPING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
1 Agency for Quality in Medicine (AQuMed), Cologne, Germany
2 New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG), Wellington, New Zealand
3 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Edinburgh, UK
4 Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Utrecht, The Netherlands
5 Centre for Quality of Care Research, University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
6 Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment (FinOHTA), Helsinki, Finland
7 Center for Outcomes and Evidence, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA
Correspondence to:
Professor G Ollenschläger
Agency for Quality in Medicine/Aerztliches Zentrum fuer Qualitaet in der Medizin, Wegelystr. 3, 10623 Berlin, Germany; ollenschlaeger{at}azq.de
ABSTRACT
Clinical practice guidelines are regarded as powerful tools to achieve effective health care. Although many countries have built up experience in the development, appraisal, and implementation of guidelines, until recently there has been no established forum for collaboration at an international level. As a result, in different countries seeking similar goals and using similar strategies, efforts have been unnecessarily duplicated and opportunities for harmonisation lost because of the lack of a supporting organisational framework. This triggered a proposal in 2001 for an international guidelines network built on existing partnerships. A baseline survey confirmed a strong demand for such an entity. A multinational group of guideline experts initiated the development of a non-profit organisation aimed at promotion of systematic guideline development and implementation. The Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) was founded in November 2002. One year later the Network released the International Guideline Library, a searchable database which now contains more than 2000 guideline resources including published guidelines, guidelines under development, "guidelines for guidelines", training materials, and patient information tools. By June 2004, 52 organisations from 27 countries had joined the network including institutions from Oceania, North America, and Europe, and WHO. This paper describes the process that led to the foundation of the G-I-N, its characteristics, prime activities, and ideas on future projects and collaboration.
Keywords: guidelines; international cooperation; evidence based medicine
Related Articles
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 406a.
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 410-411.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.W. van der Pluijm, R.P.M.G. Hermens, C. Bergh, P. de Sutter, K.G. Nygren, A.M.M. Wetzels, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer The methodological quality of clinical guidelines of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1786 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dartnell, M. Hemming, J. Collier, and G. Ollenschlaeger Putting evidence into context: some advice for guideline writers Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2008; 11(1): 6 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dartnell, M. Hemming, J. Collier, and G. Ollenschlaeger Putting evidence into context: some advice for guideline writers Evid. Based Med., October 1, 2007; 12(5): 130 - 132. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ketola, M. Kaila, and M. Honkanen Guidelines in context of evidence Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 308 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Clark, E. F. Donovan, and P. Schoettker From outdated to updated, keeping clinical guidelines valid Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2006; 18(3): 165 - 166. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Burgers Guideline Quality and Guideline Content: Are They Related? Clin. Chem., January 1, 2006; 52(1): 3 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Braillon, M Gignon, and G Dubois G-I-N must adopt the WHISKY statement Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2005; 14(5): 391 - 391. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Thomson Challenges for an international guidelines collaboration Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2004; 13(6): 409 - 410. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |