QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarrant, C
Right arrow Articles by Colman, A M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarrant, C
Right arrow Articles by Colman, A M
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:461-466
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Models of the medical consultation: opportunities and limitations of a game theory perspective

C Tarrant1, T Stokes1, A M Colman2

1 Division of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
2 School of Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK

Correspondence to:
Carolyn Tarrant
Division of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK; ccp3{at}le.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
The medical consultation is best understood as a two-way social interaction involving interactive decision making. Game theory—a theory based on assumptions of rational choice and focusing on interactive decision making—has the potential to provide models of the consultation that can be used to generate empirically testable predictions about the factors that promote quality of care. Three different game structures—the Prisoner’s Dilemma game, the Assurance game, and the Centipede game—all provide insights into the possible underlying dynamics of the doctor-patient interaction. Further empirical work is needed to uncover the underlying game structures that occur most commonly in medical consultations. Game theory has the potential to provide a new conceptual and theoretical basis for future empirical work on the interaction between doctors and their patients.


Keywords: game theory; medical consultation; doctor-patient relationship; primary health care; decision making


Relevant Article

The consultation game
G Elwyn
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 415-416. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
G Elwyn
The consultation game
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2004; 13(6): 415 - 416.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.