HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ito, H Articles by Sugawara, H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ito, H Articles by Sugawara, H

Relationship between accreditation scores and the public disclosure of accreditation reports: a cross sectional study

¹ Health Sciences Division, Minister’s Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 1-2-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan
² Hospital Evaluation Services, Japan Council for Quality Health Care, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence to:
Dr H Ito
Program Officer, Health Sciences Division, Minister’s Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 1-2-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan; itou-hiroto{at}mhlw.go.jp Objective: To examine the association between accreditation scores and the disclosure of accreditation reports.

Design: A cross sectional study.

Setting: Hospitals participating in an accreditation programme in Japan.

Participants: 547 of the 817 hospitals accredited by the Japan Council for Quality Health Care (JCQHC) by January 2003.

Main outcome measures: Data on participation in public disclosure of accreditation reports through the JCQHC website were obtained from the JCQHC database. Comments on the disclosure were obtained using a questionnaire based survey.

Results: A total of 508 (93%) of the participating hospitals disclosed their accreditation reports on the JCQHC website. Public hospitals were significantly more committed to public disclosure than private hospitals, and larger hospitals were significantly more likely to participate in public disclosure than smaller hospitals. Accreditation scores were positively related to the public disclosure of hospital accreditation reports. Scores for patient focused care and efforts to meet community needs were significantly higher in actively disclosing hospitals than in non-disclosing hospitals. Among the large hospitals, scores for safety management were significantly higher in hospitals advocating disclosure than in non-disclosing hospitals.

Conclusions: There was a positive correlation between accreditation scores and public disclosure. Our results suggest that the public disclosure of accreditation reports should be encouraged to improve public accountability and the quality of care. Future studies should investigate the interaction between public disclosure, processes and outcomes.

Keywords: accreditation; public disclosure

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Greenfield and J. Braithwaite Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 20(3): 172 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M N Marshall and P S Romano Impact of reporting hospital performance Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 77 - 78. [Full Text] [PDF]