QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, M
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, C J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, M
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, C J
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:99-106
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Pursuing integration of performance measures into electronic medical records: beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist medications

M Weiner1,2,3, T E Stump1,2, C M Callahan1,2,3, J N Lewis4, C J McDonald2,3

1 Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
2 Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
3 Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
4 Health Care Excel Inc, Medicare Quality Improvement Organization, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr M Weiner
Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute Inc, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-2872, USA; mw{at}cogit.net Objective: Electronic medical records seldom integrate performance indicators into daily operations. Assessing quality indicators traditionally requires resource intensive chart reviews of small samples. We sought to use an electronic medical record to assess use of ß-adrenergic antagonist medications (ß-blockers) following myocardial infarction, to compare a standardized manual assessment with assessment using electronic medical records, and to discuss potential for future integration of performance indicators into electronic records.

Design: Cross-sectional data analysis.

Setting: An urban academic medical center.

Participants: US Medicare beneficiaries 65 years of age or older, admitted to hospital with myocardial infarction between 1995 and 1999.

Measurements and main results: Manual chart review was compared with a computer driven assessment of electronic records. Administration of ß-blockers and cases excluded from use of ß-blockers were measured, based on Medicare criteria. Among 4490 older adults, 391 (4%) of 9018 hospital admissions contained codes for myocardial infarction. In 323 (83%) of the 391 hospital admissions, criteria for excluding ß-blockers were met; 235 (60%) were excluded due to heart failure. Of 68 hospital admissions for myocardial infarction that did not meet exclusion criteria, physicians prescribed ß-blockers in 49 (72%) on admission and 42 (62%) at discharge. Compared with manual chart review, electronic review had a sensitivity of 83–100% and led to fewer false negative findings.

Conclusions: An electronic medical records system can be used instead of chart review to measure use of ß-blockers after myocardial infarction. This should lead to integration of real time automated performance measurement into electronic medical records.


Abbreviations: AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CHF, chronic heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EMR, electronic medical record; QIO, Quality Improvement Organizations

Keywords: electronic medical records; acute myocardial infarction; beta-blockers; performance measures


Relevant Article

Quality Lines
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 73. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
P. Q. Shelley, B. R. Johnson, and E. A. BeGole
Use of an Electronic Patient Record System to Evaluate Restorative Treatment Following Root Canal Therapy
J Dent Educ., October 1, 2007; 71(10): 1333 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.