| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
1 Clinical Quality Coordinator, Goulburn Base Hospital, Goulburn; and Consultant in Clinical Quality, Southern Area Health Service, New South Wales, Australia
2 Senior Staff Specialist, Department of Anaesthesia, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
3 Consultant Anaesthetist, St John of God Hospital, Berwick, Victoria, Australia
4 Consultant Specialist, Australian Patient Safety Foundation; Visiting Research Fellow, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Correspondence to:
Professor W B Runciman
President, Australian Patient Safety Foundation, GPO Box 400, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia; research{at}apsf.net.au
Background: Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions during anaesthesia are a major cause for concern for anaesthetists. However, as individual practitioners encounter such events so rarely, the rapidity with which the diagnosis is made and appropriate management instituted varies considerably.
Objectives: To examine the role of a previously described core algorithm "COVER ABCD–A SWIFT CHECK", supplemented by a specific sub-algorithm for anaphylaxis, in the management of severe allergic reactions occurring in association with anaesthesia.
Methods: The potential performance of this structured approach for each of the relevant incidents among the first 4000 reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS) was compared with the actual performance as reported by the anaesthetists involved.
Results: There were 148 allergic reactions among the first 4000 incidents reported to AIMS. It was considered that, properly applied, the structured approach would have led to a quicker and/or better resolution of the problem in 30% of cases, and would not have caused harm had it been applied in all of them.
Conclusion: An increased awareness of the diverse clinical manifestations of allergy seen in anaesthetic practice, together with the adoption of a structured approach to management should improve and standardise the treatment and improve follow up of patients suspected of having suffered a significant allergic reaction under anaesthesia.
Keywords: crisis management; anaphylaxis; allergy; incident monitoring; anaesthesia complications
Related Article
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 156-163.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. L. Parlow and J. M. van Vlymen The methylene blues: anticipating adverse reactions to non-anesthetic drugs/Le blues du methylene : prevenir les reactions indesirables aux medicaments non anesthesiques Can J Anesth, January 1, 2008; 55(1): 1 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Hall, E. Frigas, D. Matesic, M. D. Gillett, and J. Sprung Case report: Intraoperative anaphylactoid reaction and hydroxyethyl starch in balanced electrolyte solution (Hextend(R)): [Presentation de cas : reaction anaphylactoide peroperatoire et amidon hydroxyethyle dans une solution d'electrolyte balancee (Hextend(R))]. Can J Anesth, October 1, 2006; 53(10): 989 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W B Runciman, M T Kluger, R W Morris, A D Paix, L M Watterson, and R K Webb Crisis management during anaesthesia: the development of an anaesthetic crisis management manual Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2005; 14(3): e1 - e1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R N Westhorpe, G L Ludbrook, and S C Helps Crisis management during anaesthesia: bronchospasm Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2005; 14(3): e7 - e7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R W Morris, L M Watterson, R N Westhorpe, and R K Webb Crisis management during anaesthesia: hypotension Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2005; 14(3): e11 - e11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
