© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Crisis management during anaesthesia: vascular access problems
1 Senior Staff Specialist, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
2 Consultant Anaesthetist, private practice, Adelaide, South Australia; Visiting Anaesthetist, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
3 Clinical Quality Coordinator, Goulburn Base Hospital, Goulburn; and Consultant in Clinical Quality, Southern Area Health Service, New South Wales, Australia
4 Metabolic Neurochemistry Unit, Department of Medical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor W B Runciman
President, Australian Patient Safety Foundation, GPO Box 400, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia; research{at}apsf.net.au
Background: In confronting an evolving crisis, the anaesthetist should consider the vascular catheter as a potential cause, abandoning assumptions that the device has been satisfactorily placed and is functioning correctly.
Objectives: To examine the role of a previously described core algorithm "COVER ABCDA SWIFT CHECK", supplemented by a specific sub-algorithm for vascular access problems, in the management of crises occurring in association with anaesthesia.
Methods: The potential performance of a structured approach was evaluated for each of the relevant incidents among the first 4000 reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS).
Results: There were 128 incidents involving problems related to vascular access. The structured approach begins distally, checking the infusion device or fluid (12 incidents), moving proximally by way of the fluid giving line (10), the line deadspace (8), then the catheter/skin interface (65), and on to the peripheral vascular tree (3) and central venous space (23), and finally, the interface of the vascular access system and the attending staff (7). The approach was able to accommodate all the vascular access problems among the first 4000 incidents reported to AIMS.
Conclusion: The approach has potential as an easily remembered and applied clinical tool to lead to early resolution of vascular access problems occurring during anaesthesia.
Keywords: vascular access; crisis management; line deadspace; equipment problems; anaesthesia complications
Relevant Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 156-163.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Runciman, W B, Kluger, M T, Morris, R W, Paix, A D, Watterson, L M, Webb, R K
(2005). Crisis management during anaesthesia: the development of an anaesthetic crisis management manual. Qual Saf Health Care
14: e1-e1
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Paix, A D, Bullock, M F, Runciman, W B, Williamson, J A
(2005). Crisis management during anaesthesia: problems associated with drug administration during anaesthesia. Qual Saf Health Care
14: e15-e15
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
