ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Crisis management during regional anaesthesia

M A L Fox¹, R W Morris², W B Runciman³ and A D Paix⁴

¹ Senior Staff Specialist, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
² Senior Staff Specialist and Director, Sydney Medical Simulation Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
³ Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
⁴ Consultant Anaesthetist, Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor W B Runciman
President, Australian Patient Safety Foundation, GPO Box 400, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia; research{at}apsf.net.au

Background: Regional anaesthesia is widely used and has been considered to pose few risks once the block is established. However, life threatening problems can occur both during the establishment and maintenance phases of a regional block which require prompt recognition and management.

Objectives: To examine the role of a previously described core algorithm "COVER ABCD–A SWIFT CHECK", supplemented by a specific sub-algorithm for regional anaesthesia, in the management of problems arising in association with regional anaesthesia.

Methods: The potential performance of this structured approach was assessed for each of the relevant incidents among the first 4000 reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS).

Results: There were 252 incidents involving regional anaesthesia, 6.3% of the first 4000 reports to AIMS. Of these, the majority (78%) involved the use of epidural or spinal anaesthesia. The core algorithm AB COVER CD properly applied, would have accounted for 45% of all problems, and is worth applying to eliminate unexpected problems unrelated to the regional anaesthesia technique itself. Hypotension and dysrhythmias made up over 30% of all incidents and accounted for all six deaths in the 252 incidents. The specific sub-algorithm for regional anaesthetic techniques accounted for 55% of all incidents: problems with delivery to the site of action, 49 cases (19%); problems with the block, 30 cases (12%); local anaesthetic toxicity, 30 cases (12%); trauma, infection, or pain, 14 cases (6%), wrong side or wrong patient, five cases (2%).

Conclusion: Based on an analysis of 252 incidents, the core algorithm and the regional anaesthesia sub-algorithm, properly applied, would lead to swift recognition and appropriate management of problems arising in association with regional anaesthesia.

Keywords: regional anaesthesia; regional block; local anaesthesia; anaesthesia complications; hypotension; drug errors; crisis management

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Crises in clinical care: an approach to management

W B Runciman and A F Merry
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 156-163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Runciman, W B, Kluger, M T, Morris, R W, Paix, A D, Watterson, L M, Webb, R K (2005). Crisis management during anaesthesia: the development of an anaesthetic crisis management manual. Qual Saf Health Care 14: e1-e1 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Runciman, W B, Morris, R W, Watterson, L M, Williamson, J A, Paix, A D (2005). Crisis management during anaesthesia: cardiac arrest. Qual Saf Health Care 14: e14-e14 [Abstract] [Full Text]