HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kho, M E Articles by Cook, D J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kho, M E Articles by Cook, D J Related Collections Critical Care / Intensive Care Medical error / patient safety Related Article

Safety Climate Survey: reliability of results from a multicenter ICU survey

¹ McMaster University, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
² Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Correspondence to:
Ms M E Kho
Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; khome{at}mcmaster.ca Background: It is important to understand the clinical properties of instruments used to measure patient safety before they are used in the setting of an intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: The Safety Climate Survey (SCSu), an instrument endorsed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, the Safety Culture Scale (SCSc), and the Safety Climate Mean (SCM), a subset of seven items from the SCSu, were administered in four Canadian university affiliated ICUs. All staff including nurses, allied healthcare professionals, non-clinical staff, intensivists, and managers were invited to participate in the cross sectional survey.

Results: The response rate was 74% (313/426). The internal consistency of the SCSu and SCSc was 0.86 and 0.80, respectively, while the SCM performed poorly at 0.51. Because of poor internal consistency, no further analysis of the SCM was therefore performed. Test-retest reliability of the SCSu and SCSc was 0.92. Out of a maximum score of 5, the mean (SD) scores of the SCSu and SCSc were 3.4 (0.6) and 3.4 (0.7), respectively. No differences were noted between the three medical-surgical and one cardiovascular ICU. Managers perceived a significantly more positive safety climate than other staff, as measured by the SCSu and SCSc. These results need to be interpreted cautiously because of the small number of management participants.

Conclusions: Of the three instruments, the SCSu and SCSc appear to be measuring one construct and are sufficiently reliable. Future research should examine the properties of patient safety instruments in other ICUs, including responsiveness to change, to ensure that they are valid outcome measures for patient safety initiatives.

Abbreviations: HHS, Hamilton Health Sciences; ICU, intensive care unit; SCM, Safety Climate Mean; SCSc, Safety Climate Scale; SCSu, Safety Climate Survey

Keywords: patient safety; reliability; intensive care; surveys

Related Article

Quality Lines
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 230a. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Matsubara, A. Hagihara, and K. Nobutomo Development of a patient safety climate scale in Japan Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 20(3): 211 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N C Elder, S M Brungs, M Nagy, I Kudel, and M L Render Intensive care unit nurses' perceptions of safety after a highly specific safety intervention Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 25 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Cooper, R. H. Blum, J. S. Carroll, M. Dershwitz, D. M. Feinstein, D. M. Gaba, J. C. Morey, and A. K. Singla Differences in Safety Climate Among Hospital Anesthesia Departments and the Effect of a Realistic Simulation-Based Training Program Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 574 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S M Handler, N G Castle, S A Studenski, S Perera, D B Fridsma, D A Nace, and J T Hanlon Patient safety culture assessment in the nursing home Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2006; 15(6): 400 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Hutchinson, K L Cooper, J E Dean, A McIntosh, M Patterson, C B Stride, B E Laurence, and C M Smith Use of a safety climate questionnaire in UK health care: factor structure, reliability and usability. Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 347 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J M Etchegaray and W Fischer Survey research: be careful where you step ... Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 154 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Pronovost and B Sexton Assessing safety culture: guidelines and recommendations Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 231 - 233. [Full Text] [PDF]