HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Davidoff, F Articles by Batalden, P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Davidoff, F Articles by Batalden, P Topic Collections QSHC Guidelines Related Articles

Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project

¹ Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 143 Garden Street, Wethersfield, CT 06109, USA
² Health Care Improvement Leadership Development, Dartmouth Medical School, 7251 Strasenburgh Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr F Davidoff
143 Garden Street, Wethersfield, CT 06109, USA; fdavidoff{at}cox.net
ABSTRACT
In contrast with the primary goals of science, which are to discover and disseminate new knowledge, the primary goal of improvement is to change performance. Unfortunately, scholarly accounts of the methods, experiences, and results of most medical quality improvement work are not published, either in print or electronic form. In our view this failure to publish is a serious deficiency: it limits the available evidence on efficacy, prevents critical scrutiny, deprives staff of the opportunity and incentive to clarify thinking, slows dissemination of established improvements, inhibits discovery of innovations, and compromises the ethical obligation to return valuable information to the public.The reasons for this failure are many: competing service responsibilities of and lack of academic rewards for improvement staff; editors’ and peer reviewers’ unfamiliarity with improvement goals and methods; and lack of publication guidelines that are appropriate for rigorous, scholarly improvement work. We propose here a draft set of guidelines designed to help with writing, reviewing, editing, interpreting, and using such reports. We envisage this draft as the starting point for collaborative development of more definitive guidelines. We suggest that medical quality improvement will not reach its full potential unless accurate and transparent reports of improvement work are published frequently and widely.

Keywords: quality improvement; evidence; publication; guidelines

Related Articles

Why new guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now?

D P Stevens
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 314. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. M. Berwick The Science of Quality Improvement--Reply JAMA, July 23, 2008; 300(4): 391 - 392. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. P. Newton Improving Performance in Prevention J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2008; 21(4): 258 - 260. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P Stevens How do we know? Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 154 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Berwick The Science of Improvement JAMA, March 12, 2008; 299(10): 1182 - 1184. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. F. Boat, S. M. Chao, and P. H. O'Neill From Waste to Value in Health Care JAMA, February 6, 2008; 299(5): 568 - 571. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Grol, D. M Berwick, and M. Wensing On the trail of quality and safety in health care BMJ, January 12, 2008; 336(7635): 74 - 76. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Woolf The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters JAMA, January 9, 2008; 299(2): 211 - 213. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D P Stevens and B. Andersson-Gare A proposal: publication guidelines for healthcare improvement education reports Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 402 - 402. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. V Watts, B. Shiner, A. Pomerantz, P. Stender, and W. B Weeks Outcomes of a quality improvement project integrating mental health into primary care Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 378 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Thor, J. Lundberg, J. Ask, J. Olsson, C. Carli, K. P. Harenstam, and M. Brommels Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 387 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Batalden and F. Davidoff Teaching Quality Improvement: The Devil Is in the Details JAMA, September 5, 2007; 298(9): 1059 - 1061. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. Morris and K. Dracup Quality Improvement or Research? The Ethics of Hospital Project Oversight Am. J. Crit. Care., September 1, 2007; 16(5): 424 - 426. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P Stevens If you haven't published your work, it's time to start Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 242 - 243. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Grady Quality Improvement and Ethical Oversight Ann Intern Med, May 1, 2007; 146(9): 680 - 681. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lynn, M. A. Baily, M. Bottrell, B. Jennings, R. J. Levine, F. Davidoff, D. Casarett, J. Corrigan, E. Fox, M. K. Wynia, et al. The Ethics of Using Quality Improvement Methods in Health Care Ann Intern Med, May 1, 2007; 146(9): 666 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. E. Landon, L. S. Hicks, A. J. O'Malley, T. A. Lieu, T. Keegan, B. J. McNeil, and E. Guadagnoli Improving the Management of Chronic Disease at Community Health Centers N. Engl. J. Med., March 1, 2007; 356(9): 921 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. Shojania, S. R. Ranji, K. M. McDonald, J. M. Grimshaw, V. Sundaram, R. J. Rushakoff, and D. K. Owens Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA, July 26, 2006; 296(4): 427 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G R Baker Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care. Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 150 - 151. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Pronovost and R Wachter Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back. Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 152 - 153. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Godlee Improving on improvement BMJ, May 6, 2006; 332(7549): . [Full Text] [PDF]

				M H Chin and A T Chien Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in health care: an integral part of quality improvement scholarship. Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 79 - 80. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Niederman and J. Leitch "Know what" and "know how": knowledge creation in clinical practice. J. Dent. Res., April 1, 2006; 85(4): 296 - 297. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T Greenhalgh, J Russell, and D Swinglehurst Narrative methods in quality improvement research Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 443 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D P Stevens Why new guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now? Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2005; 14(5): 314 - 314. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D M Berwick Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2005; 14(5): 315 - 316. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R G Thomson Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement? Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2005; 14(5): 317 - 318. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: