HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shojania, K G Articles by Goldman, L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shojania, K G Articles by Goldman, L Related Collections Diagnostics Other Pathology Related Article

Overestimation of clinical diagnostic performance caused by low necropsy rates

¹ Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
² Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Baylor Health Care System, USA
³ Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, CA, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr K G Shojania
The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Room C403, Box 693, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1Y 4E9; kshojania{at}ohri.ca Background: Diagnostic sensitivity is calculated as the number of correct diagnoses divided by the sum of correct diagnoses plus the number of missed or false negative diagnoses. Because missed diagnoses are generally detected during clinical follow up or at necropsy, the low necropsy rates seen in current practice may result in overestimates of diagnostic performance. Using three target conditions (aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and active tuberculosis), the prevalence of clinically missed cases among necropsied and non-necropsied deaths was estimated and the impact of low necropsy rates on the apparent sensitivity of antemortem diagnosis determined.

Methods: After reviewing case series for each target condition, the most recent study that included cases first detected at necropsy was selected and the reported sensitivity of clinical diagnosis adjusted by estimating the total number of cases that would have been detected had all decedents undergone necropsy. These estimates were based on available data for necropsy rates, time period, country (US v non-US), and case mix.

Results: For all three target diagnoses, adjusting for the estimated prevalence of clinically missed cases among non-necropsied deaths produced sensitivity values outside the 95% confidence interval for the originally reported values, and well below sensitivities reported for the diagnostic tests that are usually used to detect these conditions. For active tuberculosis the sensitivity of antemortem diagnosis decreased from an apparent value of 96% to a corrected value of 83%, with a plausible range of 42–91%; for aortic dissection the sensitivity decreased from 86% to 74%; and for pulmonary embolism the reduction fell only modestly from 97% to 91% but was still lower than generally reported values of 98% or more.

Conclusions: Failure to adjust for the prevalence of missed cases among non-necropsied deaths may substantially overstate the performance of diagnostic tests and antemortem diagnosis in general, especially for conditions with high early case fatality.

Keywords: diagnostic errors; necropsy; tuberculosis; aortic dissection; pulmonary embolism

Related Article

Quality Lines
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 393. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. G. Shojania and E. C. Burton The Vanishing Nonforensic Autopsy N. Engl. J. Med., February 28, 2008; 358(9): 873 - 875. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M A Bohensky, J E Ibrahim, and D L Ranson Making the case for more necropsies to improve patient care. Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 144 - 144. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H Guly More necropsies will improve patient care: has the case been made? Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 397 - 397. [Full Text] [PDF]