|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
Department of Anesthesiology and the Duke University Human Simulation and Patient Safety Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Correspondence to:
MC Wright PhD
Department of Anesthesiology, Box 3094, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; melanie.wright{at}duke.edu
Background: We hypothesized that time of day of surgery would influence the incidence of anesthetic adverse events (AEs).
Methods: Clinical observations reported in a quality improvement database were categorized into different AEs that reflected (1) error, (2) harm, and (3) other AEs (error or harm could not be determined) and were analyzed for effects related to start hour of care.
Results: As expected, there were differences in the rate of AEs depending on start hour of care. Compared with a reference start hour of 7 am, other AEs were more frequent for cases starting during the 3 pm and 4 pm hours (p<0.0001). Post hoc inspection of data revealed that the predicted probability increased from a low of 1.0% at 9 am to a high of 4.2% at 4 pm. The two most common event types (pain management and postoperative nausea and vomiting) may be primary determinants of these effects.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that clinical outcomes may be different for patients anesthetized at the end of the work day compared with the beginning of the day. Although this may result from patient related factors, medical care delivery factors such as case load, fatigue, and care transitions may also be influencing the rate of anesthetic AEs for cases that start in the late afternoon.
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; PONV, postoperative nausea and vomiting; QI, quality improvement
Keywords: fatigue; work schedules; time of day; adverse events; transitions
Relevant Articles
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2006 15: 447.
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2006 15: 225.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. G. Teichman, Y. Donchin, and R. J. Kot International Aeromedical Evacuation N. Engl. J. Med., January 18, 2007; 356(3): 262 - 270. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |