QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Quality and Safety in Health Care 2006;15:418-421; doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.016808
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voeffray, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wasserfallen, J.-B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Voeffray, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wasserfallen, J.-B.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of computerisation on the quality and safety of chemotherapy prescription

Marc Voeffray1, André Pannatier1, Roger Stupp2, Nadia Fucina2, Serge Leyvraz2, Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen3

1 Pharmacy Service, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
2 Multidisciplinary Oncology Centre, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
3 Medical Direction, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

Correspondence to:
J-B Wasserfallen
Medical Direction, University Hospital, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; jwasserf{at}chuv.hospvd.ch Background: Chemotherapy is prescribed according to protocols of several cycles. These protocols include not only therapeutic agents but also adjuvant solvents and inherent supportive care measures. Multiple errors can occur during the prescription, the transmission of documents and the drug delivery processes, and lead to potentially serious consequences.

Objective: To assess the effect of a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system on the number of errors in prescription recorded by the centralised chemotherapy unit of a pharmacy service in a university hospital.

Patients and methods: Existing chemotherapy protocols were standardised by a multidisciplinary team (composed of a doctor, a pharmacist and a nurse) and a CPOE system was developed from a File Maker Pro database. Chemotherapy protocols were progressively introduced into the CPOE system. The effect of the system on prescribing errors was measured over 15 months before and 21 months after starting computerised protocol prescription. Errors were classified as major (dosage and drug name) and minor (volume or type of infusion solution).

Results: Before computerisation, 141 errors were recorded for 940 prescribed chemotherapy regimens (15%). After introduction of the CPOE system, 75 errors were recorded for 1505 prescribed chemotherapy regimens (5%). Of these errors, 69 (92%) were recorded in prescriptions that did not use a computerised protocol. A dramatic decrease in the number of errors was noticeable when 50% of the chemotherapy protocols were prescribed through the CPOE system.

Conclusion: Errors in chemotherapy prescription nearly disappeared after implementation of CPOE. The safety of chemotherapy prescription was markedly improved.


Abbreviations: CPOE, computerised physician order entry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
L. N. Shulman, R. S. Miller, E. P. Ambinder, P. P. Yu, and J. V. Cox
Principles of Safe Practice Using an Oncology EHR System for Chemotherapy Ordering, Preparation, and Administration, Part 1 of 2
J. Oncol. Pract, July 1, 2008; 4(4): 203 - 206.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A J Munro
Hidden danger, obvious opportunity: error and risk in the management of cancer
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(960): 955 - 966.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.