QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Quality and Safety in Health Care 2007;16:17-22; doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.017384
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow web only appendix
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forster, A. J
Right arrow Articles by Stiell, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forster, A. J
Right arrow Articles by Stiell, I.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Adverse events following an emergency department visit

Alan J Forster, Nicholas G W Rose, Carl van Walraven, Ian Stiell

Ottawa Health Research Institute – Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence to:
Dr A J Forster
C406-1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada; aforster{at}ohri.ca Background: Many studies demonstrate a high rate of treatment-related adverse outcomes or adverse events. No studies have prospectively evaluated adverse events in patients discharged home from the emergency department (ED).

Objective: To describe the types of adverse events in patients discharged home from an ED.

Patients: Patients who were sent home directly from the ED of an urban, academic teaching hospital in Ottawa, Canada.

Methods: Patient records were reviewed to identify demographic and medical history information. Two weeks following the ED visit, patients completed a standard telephone interview to record post ED visit outcomes. Two physicians reviewed outcomes to identify all adverse events and their cause.

Results: Follow-up was complete for 399 of 408 enrolled patients. The median age was 49 years (interquartile range 36–68) and 50% were male. The most common diagnosis was "chest pain", occurring in 74 patients (18%), followed by "bone and joint disorders" in 55 patients (14%). 24 patients experienced an adverse event (incidence 6% (95% CI 4% to 9%)), of which 17 were preventable (incidence 4% (95% CI 3% to 7%)). Five of the unpreventable adverse events were medication side effects and two were minor, procedure-related complications. Of all 24 adverse events, 15 (63%; 95% CI 43 to 79%) led to an additional ED visit or a hospitalisation. Preventable adverse events occurred in 5 of 78 chest pain patients (incidence 6% (95% CI 3% to 14%)).

Conclusion: Most adverse events occurring following an ED visit are preventable and often relate to diagnostic or management errors.


Abbreviations: CTAS, Canadian Triage and Acuity Score







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.