QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Quality and Safety in Health Care 2007;16:60-66; doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.019976
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow web only appendix
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mooney, S. E
Right arrow Articles by Steadman, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mooney, S. E
Right arrow Articles by Steadman, W.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Improving emergency caesarean delivery response times at a rural community hospital

Susan E Mooney1, Greg Ogrinc2, Wendy Steadman3

1 White River Junction, VT, and Instructor of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
2 White River Junction VA, White River Junction, VT; Assistant Professor of Community and Family Medicine and Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
3 Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital, Birthing Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr S Mooney
215 North Main Street, 11Q, White River Junction, VT 05009, USA; susan.mooney{at}med.va.gov Introduction: According to national organisations, obstetric services should be able to initiate a caesarean delivery within 30 minutes of the decision to operate. This is uniquely challenging in a small, rural hospital. In 2001, the authors’ hospital was unable to meet this guideline reliably. This project demonstrates how we improved our emergency caesarean delivery response time.

Methods: The caesarean delivery process was examined, project co-chairs were selected and key personnel were identified. Four working groups (doctors, nurses, anaesthesia, operating room personnel) were formed to analyse and improve component parts of the process. Over time, multiple small changes were made, initially by each working group and then by the entire caesarean delivery team. Decision-to-incision time was the main outcome measure. The authors also measured standard birth statistics and tracked the percentage of caesarean deliveries that were classified as an emergency.

Results: Forty emergency caesarean deliveries occurred during the study. The mean decision-to-incision time dropped from 31 to 20 minutes and the treatment to goal ratio increased from 0.5 to 1.0. The percentage of caesarean deliveries that were classified as emergencies dropped significantly. There has been no change in the overall caesarean delivery rate or other markers of obstetric quality.

Conclusions: A small, rural community hospital with limited resources can consistently meet the 30 minute decision-to-incision guideline for emergency caesarean delivery.


Abbreviations: AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics; ACOG, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; APD, Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital; CNM, Certified Nurse Midwife







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.