|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ERROR MANAGEMENT |
1 Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Pharmacy, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Correspondence to:
M A Boermeester, Department of Surgery (G4-109.2), Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; m.a.boermeester{at}amc.uva.nl
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Adverse events in hospitals constitute a serious problem with grave consequences. Many studies have been conducted to gain an insight into this problem, but a general overview of the data is lacking. We performed a systematic review of the literature on in-hospital adverse events.
Methods: A formal search of Embase, Cochrane and Medline was performed. Studies were reviewed independently for methodology, inclusion and exclusion criteria and endpoints. Primary endpoints were incidence of in-hospital adverse events and percentage of preventability. Secondary endpoints were adverse event outcome and subdivision by provider of care, location and type of event.
Results: Eight studies including a total of 74 485 patient records were selected. The median overall incidence of in-hospital adverse events was 9.2%, with a median percentage of preventability of 43.5%. More than half (56.3%) of patients experienced no or minor disability, whereas 7.4% of events were lethal. Operation- (39.6%) and medication-related (15.1%) events constituted the majority. We present a summary of evidence-based interventions aimed at these categories of events.
Conclusions: Adverse events during hospital admission affect nearly one out of 10 patients. A substantial part of these events are preventable. Since a large proportion of the in-hospital events are operation- or drug-related, interventions aimed at preventing these events have the potential to make a substantial difference.
Relevant Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R G Thomson and F M Moss QIR and SQUIRE: continuum of reporting guidelines for scholarly reports in healthcare improvement Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 17(Suppl_1): i10 - i12. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |