Quality in Health Care, Vol 7, 130-135

PAPERS

Indicators of the appropriateness of long-term prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdom: consensus development, face and content validity, feasibility, and reliability

JA Cantrill, B Sibbald and S Buetow
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, UK.

OBJECTIVES: To develop valid, reliable indicators of the appropriateness of long-term prescribing in general practice medical records in the United Kingdom. DESIGN: A nominal group was used to identify potential indicators of appropriateness of prescribing. Their face and content validity were subsequently assessed in a two round Delphi exercise. Feasibility and reliability between raters were evaluated for the indicators for which consensus was reached and were suitable for application. PARTICIPANTS: The nominal group comprised a disciplinary mix of nine opinion leaders and prominent academics in the field of prescribing. The Delphi panel was composed of 100 general practitioners and 100 community pharmacists. RESULTS: The nominal group resulted in 20 items which were refined to produce 34 statements for the Delphi exercise. Consensus was reached on 30, from which 13 indicators suitable for application were produced. These were applied by two independent raters to the records of 49 purposively sampled patients in one general practice. Nine indicators showed acceptable reliability between raters. CONCLUSIONS: 9 indicators of prescribing appropriateness were produced suitable for application to the medical record of any patient on long term medication in United Kingdom general practice. Although the use of the medical record has limitations, this is currently the only available method to assess a patient's drug regimen in its entirety.

Copyright © 1998 Quality in Health Care

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Latter, J. Maben, M. Myall, and A. Young Evaluating the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing practice: method development and findings from an expert panel analysis Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 415 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Tully and J. A. Cantrill The validity of explicit indicators of prescribing appropriateness Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 18(2): 87 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. Muijrers, R. P. Grol, J. Sijbrandij, R. Janknegt, and J A. Knottnerus Differences in prescribing between GPs. Impact of the cooperation with pharmacists and impact of visits from pharmaceutical industry representatives Fam. Pract., December 1, 2005; 22(6): 624 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. I Puumalainen, J. M Kause, and M. S Airaksinen Quality Assurance Instrument Focusing on Patient Counseling Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2005; 39(7): 1220 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. Thom, R. L. Kravitz, S. Kelly-Reif, R. V. Sprinkle, J. R. Hopkins, and L. V. Rubenstein A new instrument to measure appropriateness of services in primary care Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2004; 16(2): 133 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N Britten, L Jenkins, N Barber, C Bradley, and F Stevenson Developing a measure for the appropriateness of prescribing in general practice Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2003; 12(4): 246 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. MORRIS, J. A. CANTRILL, C. D. HEPLER, and P. R. NOYCE Preventing drug-related morbidity--determining valid indicators Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2002; 14(3): 183 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S M Campbell, J Braspenning, A Hutchinson, and M Marshall Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care Qual. Saf. Health Care, January 12, 2002; 11(4): 358 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M Campbell, J. A Cantrill, and D. Roberts Prescribing indicators for UK general practice: Delphi consultation study BMJ, August 12, 2000; 321(7258): 425 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text]