© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute for Healthcare Improvement
COMMENTARY
Clinical practice guidelines
Deriving recommendations in clinical practice guidelines
Professor of Clinical Effectiveness & The William Leech Professor of Primary Care Research, Centre for Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK; martin.eccles@ncl.ac.uk
The content of guideline recommendations is influenced by a range of factors including the published evidence, cost, and the composition of the guideline development group. Increasing the sophistication and validity of guideline recommendations will lead to an increase in their length which will need a corresponding increase in the sophistication of the thinking and methods of those responsible for implementing them.
Keywords: clinical practice guidelines; guideline recommendations
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Most people who pick up a clinical practice guideline will only ever read the recommendations. Even though guidelines are an efficient exercise in research synthesis and summary, the full documentation can run to hundreds of pages—a volume that is beyond all but the most committed reader. In an attempt to address this, guideline programmes produce summary versions. These are usually formed solely of the guideline recommendations and presenting them in this way removes the possibility of the reader checking the validity of any or all of the recommendations. This means that guideline developers, and the programmes that they work with, must ensure that their processes produce recommendations that accurately reflect, not only the content of the scientific evidence, but also the appropriate range of clinical factors. In this issue of QSHC Manna et al1 present an analysis of the degree to which guideline recommendations reflect clinically important
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
- Ethnic specific recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: a first exploratory comparison between guidelines from the USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands
- D R Manna, M A Bruijnzeels, H G A Mokkink, and M Berg
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003 12: 353-358.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Submit a response
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when eLetters are posted
- Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
