© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement
Quality lines
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Discussion about differences between research and improvement has a long history and understanding the distinction may have practical consequences. To protect patients, research, an optional activity, is regulated through institutional processes. But, improvement programmes within routine practice are not, usually, subjected to regulation. No improvement activity should put patients at risk. But should obligatory activities be scrutinised as research projects? These important issues are discussed by Lynn (p 67) and Doyal (p 11). Please enter this debate and send your views through the rapid response facility on the QSHC website, http://www.qshc.com.
Research findings feed into improvement work. Being able to link what is done to what happens to patients is crucial for choosing data to guide improvement work. Taking ß blockers and aspirin after a heart attack is an effective intervention that increases survival. But as Bradley and colleagues describe (p 26), even in such an
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
- Preserving moral quality in research, audit, and quality improvement
- L Doyal
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 11-12.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Data feedback efforts in quality improvement: lessons learned from US hospitals
- E H Bradley, E S Holmboe, J A Mattera, S A Roumanis, M J Radford, and H M Krumholz
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 26-31.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Are diagnosis specific outcome indicators based on administrative data useful in assessing quality of hospital care?
- I Scott, D Youlden, and M Coory
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 32-39.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- The use of prescribing indicators to measure the quality of care in psychiatric inpatients
- C Paton and P Lelliott
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 40-45.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Is readmission to hospital an indicator of poor process of care for patients with heart failure?
- J C Luthi, B Burnand, W M McClellan, S R Pitts, and W D Flanders
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 46-51.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Introducing criteria based audit into Ugandan maternity units
- A D Weeks, G Alia, S Ononge, A Mutungi, E O Otolorin, and F M Mirembe
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 52-55.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- When does quality improvement count as research? Human subject protection and theories of knowledge
- J Lynn
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 67-70.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Submit a response
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when eLetters are posted
- Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
Topic Collections
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
