Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Quality and Safety in Health Care 2004;13:11-12; doi:10.1136/qshc.2003.008680
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:11-12
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement

COMMENTARY

Quality improvement

Preserving moral quality in research, audit, and quality improvement

L Doyal

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor L Doyal
Human Science and Medical Ethics, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 2AD, UK; l.doyal@qmul.ac.uk

Keywords: quality improvement; audit

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Most discussions about the ethics of healthcare research focus on the possible harm that could be done to participants. Sometimes such deliberations will highlight tensions between the clinical duty of care to protect the life and health of individual patients to the highest standard and the need to engage in the research that makes improvements in health care possible. Because of the potential risks, patients should not be involved in research unless they have given their informed consent. Equally, they should not be asked to participate unless the project itself has been passed through a process of independent review and its risks assessed. The moral principles for such reviews are summarised in the Declaration of Helsinki. This states, among other things, that consent is only valid if it is based on detailed and appropriate information, that risks should always be proportional to potential benefit, that confidentiality should be . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Quality lines
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

When does quality improvement count as research? Human subject protection and theories of knowledge
J Lynn
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 67-70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.