© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement
COMMENTARY
Primary care malpractice
Learning from primary care malpractice: past, present and future
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr B Hurwitz
Department of English, Kings College, London WC2R 2LS, UK; brian.hurwitz@kcl.ac.uk
Understanding of UK primary care malpractice lags behind knowledge of US primary care malpractice
Keywords: patient safety; medical errors; malpractice; primary care
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"Medications that clean bile and phlegm are a source of danger, and of blame for the person treating". Hippocrates. Affections 33.1
The tangled relations between disease, treatment, patient harm, medical fallibility, and physician culpability have been debated since classical times. But it is only historically recently that actions alleging negligence by doctors have become a commonplace feature of the health care landscape.
One hundred years ago an experienced Scottish judge, while hearing a legal case against an Edinburgh general practitioner (see box), commented on its rarity: "This action is certainly one of a particularly unusual character. It is an action of damages against a medical man. In my somewhat long experience I cannot remember having seen a similar case before."2
Only a century later the medicolegal landscape of health care could hardly be more different. In the year 2000 the UK General Medical Council received 5000 complaints
Relevant Article
- Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States
- R L Phillips, Jr, L A Bartholomew, S M Dovey, G E Fryer, Jr, T J Miyoshi, and L A Green
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 121-126.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Jiwa, M., Saunders, C.
(2007). Fast track referral for cancer. BMJ
335: 267-268
[Full Text] -
Bismark, M M, Brennan, T A, Paterson, R J, Davis, P B, Studdert, D M
(2006). Relationship between complaints and quality of care in New Zealand: a descriptive analysis of complainants and non-complainants following adverse events. Qual Saf Health Care
15: 17-22
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
