QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Articles
Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:161
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement

Quality Lines

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


STANDARDS OF CARE
Professionals are sometimes unaware of patients’ perceptions of their practices. A survey was conducted in five short stay hospitals in France. Twenty standards of care dealing with patient information were assessed by patients and health professionals, who rated statements regarding patient care by expressing agreement or disagreement. Overall, patients’ and professionals’ views on what was best or worst were similar, but some differences in the perception of care were also observed. For example, the common wisdom among many practitioners is that pain management is inadequate and requires more concern. However, patients were far more satisfied with this care than the professionals. Everyone agreed that consent was requested before surgery and that visitors were asked to leave the room before an examination, but patients felt that more attention should be paid to non-technical aspects of care, to information after discharge, and to help with psychosocial problems if high quality health care . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Articles

Will changes in primary care improve health outcomes? Modelling the impact of financial incentives introduced to improve quality of care in the UK
P McElduff, G Lyratzopoulos, R Edwards, R F Heller, P Shekelle, and M Roland
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 191-197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Comparison of health care professionals’ self-assessments of standards of care and patients’ opinions on the care they received in hospital: observational study
P Durieux, A Bissery, S Dubois, I Gasquet, and J Coste
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 198-202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Assessing risk: the role of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in patient safety improvement
J Wreathall and C Nemeth
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 206-212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Clinicians, librarians and patient safety: opportunities for partnership
L Zipperer
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 218-222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.