QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walton, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walton, M
Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:163-164
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


EDITORIAL

"No blame" culture

Creating a "no blame" culture: have we got the balance right?

M Walton

Correspondence to:
Associate Professor M Walton
Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; mwalton@dme.med.usyd.edu.au


There is a need to clarify where and how professional responsibility fits into the "no blame" culture

Keywords: patient safety; medical error; professional responsibility

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

How the media reports patient harm associated with adverse events continues to cause public concern and disturb health professionals. The need for health professionals to communicate more effectively with the public about medical errors has been identified,1,2 but to date there is little evidence of this happening. Tensions surrounding professional responsibility and accountability (as opposed to institutional accountability) and the quality and safety "no blame" approach within the health system prevent health professionals communicating clearly with the public. How can we give a clear message to the public when we do not have a clear understanding of these issues ourselves?

The current focus on improving care by redesigning systems, tasks and workforce3 necessarily emphasises the multiple factors underpinning errors, relies on reporting systems for capturing errors, and advocates a "blame free" environment so that staff will report their mistakes or near misses. This approach examines system factors . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
S Buetow and G Elwyn
Are patients morally responsible for their errors?
J. Med. Ethics, May 1, 2006; 32(5): 260 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.