COMMENTARY

Communicating risks in health care

Flexible rather than standardised approaches to communicating risks in health care

A Edwards

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A Edwards
Department of Primary Care, Swansea Clinical School, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK; a.g.k.edwards@swan.ac.uk

---

A sufficiently flexible approach to risk communication is needed to accommodate a wide range of patient interpretation and preferences for information

---

Keywords: side effects; risk perception; drug information; patient-caregiver communication; decision making

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Informed medical decision making depends at least partly on understanding the benefits and harms of different treatment options. This requires clear and relevant risk communication. In practice this means that information should include both harms and benefits where relevant, and be presented honestly—not hiding information thought to be less desirable. Attention should be paid to the potential pitfalls of "framing"—how different formats such as relative and absolute risk can manipulate decisions made.¹ Certain types of risk information such as "natural frequencies" (for example, 1 in 10) are generally more consistently and accurately interpreted than percentages (for example, 10%). In percentages, the reference class (population or group to which the figure applies) is often not clearly specified.² For any data, though, there are uncertainties and these should be shared where evident.³ There is support for having a range of information formats available (a "toolbox") so that . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines

P Knapp, D K Raynor, and D C Berry
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 176-180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Brezis, M., Israel, S., Weinstein-Birenshtock, A., Pogoda, P., Sharon, A., Tauber, R. (2008). Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 20: 352-357 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• France, J, Keen, C, Bowyer, S (2008). Communicating risk to emergency department patients with chest pain. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 276-278 [Abstract] [Full Text]