|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
EDITORIAL |
| Volume-quality relationship |
Correspondence to:
Professor T A Sheldon
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK; tas5@york.ac.uk
Keywords: volume-quality relationship; quality indicator
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Health service planners are increasingly trying to find ways to improve the quality and safety of health care. A wide range of approaches is being used from high level regulatory frameworks, use of clinical guidance and guidelines, to more micro level activity such as audit of care. None of these is easy; all require significant investment of resources, training, time and monitoring. The results are often uneven and result in variations in quality as initiatives diffuse unevenly through the system. It is understandable then that policy makers seek easier ways to deliver these improvements.
Research since the late 1970s seemed to point in the direction of a relatively constant relationship in health careincreased use of a hospital procedure reduces the mortality associated with it. The message emerging from a large number of studies, mainly from the USA, was that patients treated in hospitals which (or by clinicians who)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Nordin and W. v. d. Linden Volume of procedures and risk of recurrence after repair of groin hernia: national register study BMJ, April 26, 2008; 336(7650): 934 - 937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Jessop Make it boring. J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2006; 28(2): 87 - 87. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |