QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, T A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, T A
Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:325-326
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


EDITORIAL

Volume-quality relationship

The volume-quality relationship: insufficient evidence for use as a quality indicator

T A Sheldon

Correspondence to:
Professor T A Sheldon
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK; tas5@york.ac.uk


The relationship between volume and quality is still unclear

Keywords: volume-quality relationship; quality indicator

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Health service planners are increasingly trying to find ways to improve the quality and safety of health care. A wide range of approaches is being used from high level regulatory frameworks, use of clinical guidance and guidelines, to more micro level activity such as audit of care. None of these is easy; all require significant investment of resources, training, time and monitoring. The results are often uneven and result in variations in quality as initiatives diffuse unevenly through the system. It is understandable then that policy makers seek easier ways to deliver these improvements.

Research since the late 1970s seemed to point in the direction of a relatively constant relationship in health care—increased use of a hospital procedure reduces the mortality associated with it. The message emerging from a large number of studies, mainly from the USA, was that patients treated in hospitals which (or by clinicians who) . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
P. Nordin and W. v. d. Linden
Volume of procedures and risk of recurrence after repair of groin hernia: national register study
BMJ, April 26, 2008; 336(7650): 934 - 937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
E. G. Jessop
Make it boring.
J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2006; 28(2): 87 - 87.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.