QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elwyn, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elwyn, G
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:415-416
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute for Healthcare Improvement


COMMENTARY

Game theory

The consultation game

G Elwyn

Correspondence to:
Professor G Elwyn
Primary Care Group, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK; g.elwyn@swansea.ac.uk


Exploring the use of game theory to address quality

Keywords: game theory; medical consultation; doctor-patient relationship; primary health care; decision making

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Game theory and clinical practice seem an unlikely marriage and it may not be obvious how such a combination could improve the quality of clinical consultations. But this area of applied mathematics seems set to reduce some of our quintessential human foibles to a predictable set of behaviours based on what you win and what you lose (forget about how you play the game—at last it’s officially all about winning). Game theory could be a sharp new tool for dissecting the mass of behaviours at play in the medical consultation, a historically paternalistic human interaction that stretches back as far as Hippocrates.

Medicine is a service delivered by a mix of episodic and repeated interactions between humans, medicated by the use of technologies such as tests, drugs and procedures. There is clear evidence that there is communication failure in consultations and that adherence to advice and treatment is . . . [Full text of this article]


Related Article

Models of the medical consultation: opportunities and limitations of a game theory perspective
C Tarrant, T Stokes, and A M Colman
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2004 13: 461-466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.