Quality Lines
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In this issue of QSHC, readers will find new proposed draft guidelines for reporting healthcare improvement research. Medical quality improvement will not reach its full potential unless accurate and transparent reports of improvement work are published, frequently and widely. These authors propose a draft set of publication guidelines designed to help with writing, reviewing, editing, interpreting, and using such reports. The editors of QSHC publish this draft with an invitation to authors, reviewers, and editors to contribute their comments regarding the utility of these guidelines.
See p 314, 315, 317, and 319
Eight healthcare services in the UK set up action research projects with an explicit objective of reducing inequalities in access. Projects included community based palliative care, general practice asthma care, hospital based cardiology clinics, and termination of pregnancy services. A number of evidence-based changes to service provision were proposed and implemented with variable success. Key
Relevant Articles
- Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back
- P Pronovost and R Wachter
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2006 15: 152-153.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Why new guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now?
- D P Stevens
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 314.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine
- D M Berwick
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 315-316.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement?
- R G Thomson
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 317-318.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project
- F Davidoff and P Batalden
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 319-325.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Reducing inequalities in access to health care: developing a toolkit through action research
- E C Goyder, L Blank, E Ellis, A Furber, J Peters, K Sartain, and C Massey
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 336-339.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Multiplicity of medication safety terms, definitions and functional meanings: when is enough enough?
- K H Yu, R L Nation, and M J Dooley
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 358-363.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Quality effects of operative delay on mortality in hip fracture treatment
- R Sund and A Liski
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 371-377.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Effectiveness of routine reporting to identify minor and serious adverse outcomes in surgical patients
- P J Marang-van de Mheen, N van Hanegem, and J Kievit
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 378-382.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Effectiveness of a graduate medical education program for improving medical event reporting attitude and behavior
- Y M Coyle, S Q Mercer, C L Murphy-Cullen, G W Schneider, and L S Hynan
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005 14: 383-388.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
