|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
LETTER |
Monash University, Department of Forensic Medicine, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, 5783 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, Australia
Correspondence to:
M A Bohensky
State Coroners Office, 5783 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, Australia 3006;meganb@vifm.org
Keywords: diagnostic errors; necropsy
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In their recent study Shojania et al1 highlight the importance of necropsy to clinical care by demonstrating how diagnostic sensitivity for three conditions is overestimated without necropsy results. This study prompted an editorial by Guly calling for more research to show that increasing necropsy rates can improve patient care.2
Clearly, the evidence establishing the value of necropsy for identifying diagnostic and management issues relevant to patient care3 is not preventing the international decline in the number of hospital necropsies. We therefore support Gulys petition for more evidence and describe our efforts to improve communication between pathologists and clinicians to facilitate such research.
At the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, forensic necropsies are conducted on approximately 80% of hospital deaths investigated by the Coroners Office in Victoria, Australia.4 A significant barrier to using the lessons of forensic necropsy for the improvement of clinical care is the lack of communication channels between
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |