QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Quality and Safety in Health Care 2006;15:144-a-144
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bohensky, M A
Right arrow Articles by Ranson, D L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bohensky, M A
Right arrow Articles by Ranson, D L
Related Collections
Right arrow Diagnostics
Right arrow Other Pathology

LETTER

Making the case for more necropsies to improve patient care

M A Bohensky, J E Ibrahim, D L Ranson

Monash University, Department of Forensic Medicine, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, 57–83 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, Australia

Correspondence to:
M A Bohensky
State Coroner’s Office, 57–83 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, Australia 3006;meganb@vifm.org

Keywords: diagnostic errors; necropsy

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In their recent study Shojania et al1 highlight the importance of necropsy to clinical care by demonstrating how diagnostic sensitivity for three conditions is overestimated without necropsy results. This study prompted an editorial by Guly calling for more research to show that increasing necropsy rates can improve patient care.2

Clearly, the evidence establishing the value of necropsy for identifying diagnostic and management issues relevant to patient care3 is not preventing the international decline in the number of hospital necropsies. We therefore support Guly’s petition for more evidence and describe our efforts to improve communication between pathologists and clinicians to facilitate such research.

At the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, forensic necropsies are conducted on approximately 80% of hospital deaths investigated by the Coroner’s Office in Victoria, Australia.4 A significant barrier to using the lessons of forensic necropsy for the improvement of clinical care is the lack of communication channels between . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.