HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Etchegaray, J M Articles by Fischer, W Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Etchegaray, J M Articles by Fischer, W

Survey research: be careful where you step ...

The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr J M Etchegaray
The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 141, Houston, TX 77030, USA; jmetcheg@mdanderson.org

Keywords: reliability; validity; survey research; safety culture; patient safety

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Two interesting articles recently appeared in QSHC. Kho et al¹ published their findings about the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of different forms of the Safety Climate Survey,² and this was followed by some guidelines by Pronovost and Sexton³ about the measurement of culture. Given that researchers are focusing more on using surveys to measure different issues related to culture, the focus of the present discussion is to examine common misconceptions about the reliability and validity of different constructs. Advances in other fields are also mentioned to shed light on some of the perplexing issues faced by health services researchers attempting to study culture. While Pronovost and Sexton³ are correct in stating that "we must understand these sources of variation in order to target" different improvement opportunities and that "failure to understand these important issues can cause managers to make incorrect inferences regarding scores" . . . [Full text of this article]