QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Quality and Safety in Health Care 2008;17:79; doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.023325
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

POSTSCRIPT

LETTERS

Practice guidelines for haemodialysis in Egypt

Correspondence to:
Dr M F Allam, Department of Community, Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Abbassia 11566, Cairo, Egypt; fm2faahm@uco.es

Accepted 17 September 2007

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

End-stage renal disease is one of the main health problems in Egypt. Currently, haemodialysis represents the main mode for treatment of chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD5), previously called end-stage renal disease or chronic renal failure.

Applying international guidelines for haemodialysis in Egypt might not be suitable or feasible, because of different health systems and lack of resources. Previously, the Egyptian Society of Nephrology has developed management guidelines for haemodialysis, especially cornering personnel items. This called for developing the Egyptian guidelines for basic haemodialysis practice in different facilities.

Clinical practice guidelines often grade the "strength" of their recommendations according to the robustness of the supporting research evidence.1 Accordingly, the Egyptian guidelines were adopted from the standards developed by The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (Canada), The National Kidney Foundation (USA), The Clinical Standards Board for Scotland (Scotland) and The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (Canada). . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.