QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walshe, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walshe, K.
Quality in Health Care 2000;9: 47-52
© 2000 Quality in Health Care


Special articles

Adverse events in health care: issues in measurement

Kieran Walshe

Dr K Walshe, senior research fellow, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Park House, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham B15 2RT, UK Introduction

Adverse events—"instances which indicate or may indicate that a patient has received poor quality care"1—are used widely in healthcare quality measurement and improvement activities. Many commonly employed quality improvement mechanisms, such as incident reporting, occurrence screening, significant event auditing, processes for dealing with complaints, and (in the UK) the national confidential enquiries into various areas of clinical care are essentially focused on such adverse events. Even traditional medical quality improvement mechanisms such as mortality and morbidity conferences or death and complications meetings are predicated on the idea that by identifying and examining adverse events, we can learn lessons and change practice in ways that will make such events less likely in future and hence improve the quality of health care.

The principle that studying adverse events can produce information which leads to quality improvements is far from new and has been much used outside of health care.2, 3 It has . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A. B.-A. Sari, T. A Sheldon, A. Cracknell, A. Turnbull, Y. Dobson, C. Grant, W. Gray, and A. Richardson
Extent, nature and consequences of adverse events: results of a retrospective casenote review in a large NHS hospital
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 434 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
K H Yu, R L Nation, and M J Dooley
Multiplicity of medication safety terms, definitions and functional meanings: when is enough enough?
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2005; 14(5): 358 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
R Wilf-Miron, I Lewenhoff, Z Benyamini, and A Aviram
From aviation to medicine: applying concepts of aviation safety to risk management in ambulatory care
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2003; 12(1): 35 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
M. García-martín, P. Lardelli-claret, and J. J. Jiménez-moleón
Adverse events in health care
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2000; 9(3): 198 - 198.
[Full Text]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
E. West
Organisational sources of safety and danger: sociological contributions to the study of adverse events
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2000; 9(2): 120 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.