QSHC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wensing, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wensing, M
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Quality in Health Care 2000;9: 200-201
© 2000 Quality in Health Care


Editorial

Evidence-based patient empowerment

M Wensing

Centre for Research on Quality in General Practice, University of Nijmegen and Maastricht, P O Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands M.Wensing@hsv.kun.nl

Patient empowerment is a high priority for healthcare policy makers in many countries. By increasing the role of patients, health care providers should become more responsive to patients' needs and preferences and deliver better quality care. Patients can participate in health care in many ways. These include communicating directly to healthcare professionals in patient centred consultations; contributing to routine practice outside the consultation through quality of life questionnaires and patient satisfaction surveys; and, increasingly, by using information on health and health care through internet channels.

Many questionnaires on patient satisfaction have been developed in the past decade but they do not all meet the needs of either the consumers or the healthcare professionals.1 Before being used on a wide scale, new approaches to capturing patients' views need to be assessed in well designed studies with a similar stringency to that which is applied to clinical interventions. In this issue of . . . [Full text of this article]


Related Article

Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services
S Grogan, M Conner, P Norman, D Willits, and I Porter
Qual. Health Care 2000 9: 210-215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
L. L. Soderlund, P. Nilsen, and M. Kristensson
Learning motivational interviewing: Exploring primary health care nurses' training and counselling experiences
Health Education Journal, June 1, 2008; 67(2): 102 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Wensing and G. Elwyn
Improving the quality of health care: Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care
BMJ, April 19, 2003; 326(7394): 877 - 879.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
M Wensing and G Elwyn
Research on patients' views in the evaluation and improvement of quality of care
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2002; 11(2): 153 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
E Vingerhoets, M Wensing, and R Grol
Feedback of patients' evaluations of general practice care: a randomised trial
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2001; 10(4): 224 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A Bowling and S Ebrahim
Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i2 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.