You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Error management
Omitted and unjustified medications in the discharge summary
  1. A Perren1,
  2. M Previsdomini1,
  3. B Cerutti2,
  4. D Soldini3,
  5. D Donghi3,
  6. C Marone3
  1. 1
    Intensive Care Unit, Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland
  2. 2
    Ufficio del medico cantonale, Department of Public Health and Social Welfare, Bellinzona, Switzerland
  3. 3
    Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland
  1. Dr A Perren, Intensive Care Unit, Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli, CH-6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland; andreas.perren{at}eoc.ch

Abstract

Background: Limited information exists in regard to drug omissions and unjustified medications in the hospital discharge summary (DS).

Objective: To evaluate the incidence and types of drug omissions and unjustified medications in the DS, and to assess their potential impact on patient health.

Methods: A prospective observational review of the DSs of all patients discharged from our Internal Medicine Department over a 3-month period. Data assessment was made by internists using a structured form.

Results: Of the 577 evaluated DSs, 66% contained at least one inconsistency accounting for a total of 1012 irregularities. There were 393 drug omissions affecting 251 patients, 32% of which were potentially harmful. Seventeen per cent of all medications (619/3691) were unjustified, affecting 318 patients. The unjustified medication was potentially harmful in 16% of cases, occurred significantly more frequent in women than in men (61% vs 50%; p = 0.008) and increased linearly with the number of drugs prescribed (p<0.001). Drug omission had a twofold higher potential to cause harm than unjustified medication.

Conclusions: Drug omissions and unjustified medications are frequent, and systemic changes are required to substantially reduce these inconsistencies.

https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.024588

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None.

    • Ethics approval: Ethics approval was obtained from the hospital (Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli) Ethics Committee (Comitato Etico Cantonale).

    Linked Articles

    • Quality lines
      Quality lines
      David P Stevens
      BMJ Quality & Safety 2009; 18 i-i Published Online First: 24 May 2009.