rss
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:242 doi:10.1136/qhc.12.4.242
  • Commentary
  • Shared care

Shared care: step down or step up?

  1. E J Maher,
  2. D Millar
  1. Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr E J Maher, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK; 
 jane.maher{at}mvh-ljmc.org

    Shared care arrangements between hospitals and primary care for the management of patients with cancer must be seen as a step up from “usual” care in general practice rather than a step down from hospital practice.

    Formal “shared care” in cancer remains controversial. It is promoted as offering patients care closer to home while, at the same time, reducing the burden on specialist services. Primary care practitioners are divided on the issue, some viewing shared care as enhancing their practice and others as another example of hospitals offloading work onto an already overloaded primary care sector. There is some evidence to suggest that primary care based follow up alone is acceptable to patients and provides similar outcomes to specialist follow up in breast cancer,1,2 although this is disputed by others who cite patient preference3 or difficulties …

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.