rss
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:469-477 doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.021501
  • Original Article

Exploring users’ experiences of accessing out-of-hours primary medical care services

  1. S H Richards1,
  2. P Pound1,
  3. A Dickens1,
  4. M Greco2,
  5. J L Campbell1
  1. 1
    General Practice and Primary Care, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter, UK
  2. 2
    Client Focused Evaluation Programme Ltd, The Innovation Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  1. J L Campbell, General Practice and Primary Care, Peninsula Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Smeall Building, Magdalen Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK; john.campbell{at}pms.ac.uk
  • Accepted 13 June 2007

Abstract

Background: Since 2000, out-of-hours primary medical care services in the UK have undergone major changes in the organisation and delivery of services in response to recommendations by the Carson Review and more recently, through the new General Medical Services Contract (GMS2). People calling their general practice in the evening or at weekends are redirected to the out-of-hours service which may offer telephone advice, a home visit or a visit to a treatment centre. Little is known about users’ experiences under the new arrangements.

Aim: To explore users’ experiences of out-of-hours primary medical care.

Design of study: A qualitative study employing focus groups and telephone interviews.

Setting: Three out-of-hours primary medical care service providers in England.

Methods: Focus groups and telephone interviews were conducted with 27 recent users of out-of-hours services.

Results: Key areas of concern included the urgency with which cases are handled, and delays when waiting for a call back or home visit. Users felt that providers were reluctant to do home visits. The service was regarded as under-resourced and frequently misused. Many expressed anxiety about calling, feeling unsure about how appropriate their call was and many were uncertain about how the service operated.

Conclusions: Service users need clear information on how current out-of-hours services operate and how it should be used. Problems with triaging need to be addressed, users should be kept informed of any delays, and care needs to be taken to ensure that the new arrangements do not alienate older people or individuals with complex health needs.

Footnotes

  • Ethical approval: The study was approved by North and East Devon Research Ethics Committee. Ref no: REC 05/Q2102/1.

  • Funding: The study was funded by the Department of Health.

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Abbreviation:
    PCT
    primary care trust

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.