rss
Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:387-392 doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.023267
  • Quality improvement report

Clinical and economic impact of an antibiotics stewardship programme in a regional hospital in Hong Kong

  1. C K Ng1,
  2. T C Wu1,
  3. W M J Chan1,
  4. Y S W Leung2,
  5. C K P Li1,
  6. D N C Tsang3,
  7. G M Leung4
  1. 1
    Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
  2. 2
    Department of Pharmacy, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
  3. 3
    Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
  4. 4
    School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  1. Dr C K Ng, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Hong Kong, China; ngck6{at}ha.org.hk
  • Accepted 12 November 2007

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate use of antibiotics is one of the important factors attributing to emergence of drug-resistant pathogens. Infection with multidrug-resistant pathogens adversely affects quality of medical care.

Context: Queen Elizabeth Hospital, an 1800-bed acute service hospital in Hong Kong. Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for treating acute infections.

Key measures for improvement: Reduce inappropriate prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics and overall antibiotic prescription through implementation of a multidisciplinary antibiotics stewardship programme (ASP).

Strategies for change: A multidisciplinary programme involving policy and guideline formulation, education and feedback, monthly antibiotic consumption and cost monitoring, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern reporting and concurrent feedbacks for commonly prescribed broad-spectrum antibiotics was implemented in 2004. Predefined logistics to prescribe “restricted” antibiotics were formulated and implemented with collaborative efforts from clinical and non-clinical departments. The programme was supported by management at department and hospital levels.

Effects of change: Broad-spectrum antibiotics were prescribed inappropriately in 28.9% (n = 192) clinical scenarios. The ASP reduced the restricted and total antibiotic consumption as well as the antibiotics-related costs. Predefined clinical outcomes were not adversely affected. Economic analysis suggested that the extra human cost in running ASP could be offset by savings from antibiotic expenditure.

Lessons learned: It is cost-effective to implement a multidisciplinary ASP in acute service hospitals as the programme reduces antibiotic consumption and results in overall cost savings. The quality of medical care is not jeopardised as the important clinical outcomes are not adversely affected. The generalisability and sustainability of ASPs in other clinical contexts warrant further studies to ensure the continuous success of this programme.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. web only appendix

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content


Free trial
Individuals may register for a free 60 day online trial to all content.

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.