rss
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:174-180 doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.024836
  • Original research

A national facilitation project to improve primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards Framework on process and self-ratings of quality

This article has been Unlocked
  1. J Dale1,
  2. M Petrova1,
  3. D Munday1,
  4. J Koistinen-Harris1,
  5. R Lall1,
  6. K Thomas2,3
  1. 1
    Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
  2. 2
    John Taylor Hospice, Birmingham, UK
  3. 3
    School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  1. J Dale, Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; jeremy.dale{at}warwick.ac.uk
  • Accepted 18 May 2008

Abstract

Background: Improving quality of end-of-life care is a key driver of UK policy. The Gold Standards Framework (GSF) for Palliative Care aims to strengthen primary palliative care through facilitating implementation of systematic clinical and organisational processes.

Objectives: To describe the general practices that participated in the GSF programme in 2003–5 and the changes in process and perception of quality that occurred in the year following entry into the programme, and to identify factors associated with the extent of change.

Methods: Participating practices completed a questionnaire at baseline and another approximately 12 months later. Data were derived from categorical questions about the implementation of 35 organisational and clinical processes, and self-rated assessments of quality, associated with palliative care provision.

Participants: 1305 practices (total registered population almost 10 million). Follow-up questionnaire completed by 955 (73.2%) practices (after mean (SD) 12.8 (2.8) months; median 13 months).

Findings: Mean increase in total number of processes implemented (maximum  = 35) was 9.6 (95% CI 9.0 to 10.2; p<0.001; baseline: 15.7 (SD 6.4), follow-up: 25.2 (SD 5.2)). Extent of change was largest for practices with low baseline scores. Aspects of process related to coordination and communication showed the greatest change. All dimensions of quality improved following GSF implementation; change was highest for the “quality of palliative care for cancer patients” and “confidence in assessing, recording and addressing the physical and psychosocial areas of patient care”.

Conclusion: Implementation of the GSF seems to have resulted in substantial improvements in process and quality of palliative care. Further research is required of the extent to which this has enhanced care (physical, practical and psychological outcomes) for patients and carers.

Footnotes

  • Funding: Macmillan Cancer Support funded the evaluation and the practices that completed questionnaires.

  • Competing interests: KT is the National Clinical Lead for the GSF Programme (http://www.goldstandardsframework.nhs.uk).

This article has been Unlocked

This Article

  1. Free via Creative Commons: CC
  2. Abstract
  3. Full text
  4. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content


Free trial
Individuals may register for a free 60 day online trial to all content.

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.