rss
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:374-379 doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.028175
  • Original research

Assessment of patients’ tendency to give a positive or negative rating to healthcare

  1. T Agoritsas1,
  2. A Lubbeke2,
  3. L Schiesari3,
  4. T V Perneger1
  1. 1
    Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  2. 2
    Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  3. 3
    Quality of Care Service, University Hospitals of Geneva, and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to Thomas V Perneger, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, 24 Micheli-du-Crest, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; mthomas.perneger{at}hcuge.ch
  • Accepted 14 July 2008

Abstract

Background: Adjustment of patient satisfaction scores for case-mix variables such as age and sex may lead to overadjustment. The patient’s tendency to rate healthcare positively or negatively may be the only variable that should be adjusted to improve the comparability of satisfaction scores between healthcare providers.

Objective: To develop a measure of “rating tendency”, assess its stability over time, explore its distribution across subgroups of patients and its association with patient opinion scores.

Design and Subjects: A scale based on 10 hypothetical scenarios describing hospital care episodes was developed. It was administered both before and after hospitalisation to 203 patients programmed for elective orthopaedic surgery in a Swiss teaching hospital. A problem score regarding the actual hospitalisation was obtained at follow-up.

Results: The rating tendency scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach α 0.85), and factor analysis confirmed that it measured a single underlying concept. However, the correlation between prehospitalisation and posthospitalisation measures was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.55, p<0.001), as was the correlation with the hospitalisation problem score (Spearman r = −0.22, p = 0.002). The pattern of rating tendency across subgroups of respondents mirrored the pattern of problem scores. Adjusting for the rating tendency had little effect on comparisons of problem scores between subgroups of patients, all of whom were treated at the same hospital.

Conclusions: A patient’s “rating tendency” can be measured using a reliable 10-item scale. The utility of adjusting satisfaction scores for rating tendency when comparing hospitals remains to be tested.

Footnotes

  • Funding At the time of the study, TA and TVP were with the Quality of Care Service, University Hospitals of Geneva, and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Competing interests None declared.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.